SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 146

D.BASU
RANJIT KUMAR CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, AMAR NATH DHOLE, ARUN K.DUTT, B.P.BANERJI, R.CHAUDHARY, S.C.BOSE, S.K.DUTTA

D. BASU, J.

( 1 ) COMMON questions of law have been raised by these two petitions brought by two employees of the Durgapur Steel Plant appertaining to the Hindusthan Steel Ltd.

( 2 ) IN C. R. 1330, the Petitioner was the General Manager, who was appointed on 9-4-65 by the order of the President of India, which is at Annexure A, The Petitioner alleges that in the first week of July. 1967, he was verbally asked to resign by Sri Rao, Chairman of the Hindusthan Steel Ltd. , (Respondent No. 4 ). On the 17th July, he was handed over the impugned letter at Ann. B, by the Chairman. This letter states that- (a) Government "have decided to terminate your services. . . . . . . . . with effect from the forenoon of the 19th July, 1967"; (b) The Petitioner had, however, the option of submitting resignation, which would be readily granted; (c) The Petitioner might also terminate the contract with the Hindusthan Steel by sending a notice with a leave application before the 19th July, in which case he would be granted all the leave that was due to him and thereafter his services would stand terminated on the expiry of that leave or on the expiry of three months from 19-7-68, whichever was later.








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top