SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 372

S.B.SINHA, RANAJIT KUMAR MITRA
BHUBAN CHANDRA PATTANAYAK – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMAN KANTI BASU, M.M.GUHA, N.CHAUDHARY, SANAT ROY

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment of order dated 21. 3. 80 passed by Sri S. K. Sinha, Subordinate Judge, Midnapore in Judicial Misc. Case No. 45 of 1996 whereby and whereunder the said learned court allowed an application filed by the respondent under section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as the said Act) filed by the respondent herein.

( 2 ) THE basic fact of the matter is not in the dispute. The appellant herein was owner of a bus bearing No. WGB-3208. The first respondent in terms of a comprehensive policy dated 30. 7. 73 filed a claim for a sum of Rs. 90,000.

( 3 ) IT is admitted that the appellant was granted a temporary permit for running the said bus from Rasulpur to Solpatta. An accident took place in between Boral and Aruan resulting in death of a child on 6. 11. 73. The said bus was set on fire by a mob resulting in a total loss of the bus. Two criminal cases were filed in respect of the said incident, one against the driver of the said bus and another against some of the members of the public who had set fire on the bus. The plaintiff informed the Insurance Company, the opposite party h

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top