ARUN KUMAR MITRA
SEKH SAJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
GORACHAND SAHEB SEKH ABDUL MOHIT – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS second appeal has arisen out of a suit for permanent injunction. The case as made out in the plaint is inter alia as follows :the suit property is a "pirothan" property of Pir Gorachand Saheb and the predecessor of the plaintiffs Ahid was the shebait of the suit property. The lands in the suit khatian were divided amongst the shebaits and all the shebaits were possessing those lands by demarcating boundaries. Ahid was possessing the suit property by demarcating boundaries within the knowledge of other shebaits. The plaintiffs have also been possessing the suit property since the time of deceased Ahid. The suit plot is homestead land There are three huts upon. 03 decimals of land in the suit plot and Ahid used to live there with his family. The said. 03 decimals of land have been recorded in the name of the plaintiffs in present L. R. Khatian. The plaintiffs have been possessing the remaining. 12 decimals of land in the suit plot since the time of their predecessor. The suit plot was never possessed by any other persons except Ahid and the present plaintiffs. Besides that the plaintiffs have two dwelling huts, one cow-shed and one kitchen in the suit plot
Referred to : Hamlda v. Md. Kahlil
Walter Louis Frauklin v. George Singh
Corporation of the City of Bangalore v. M. Papaiah
Smt. Annapoorani Ammal v. G.Thangapalam
Punjab Wakf Board v. Captain Mohar Singh
N.S.S.Ltd. v. Rev. Fr. Alexander
Commissioner of Wakfs, W.B. v. Sm. Ayesa Bibi
Satya Gupta (Smt.) Alias Madhu Gupta v. Brijesh Kumar
Smt. Kamala Devi Budhia v. Hem Prabha Ganguli.
Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala v. Gram Sabha, Basali
Municipal Committee v. Hazara Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.