SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 147

TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY
Nihar Biswas – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Laxmi Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Biswarup Bhattacharya, Advocate, Sudeshna Mazumdar, Advocate, Somesh Kumar Ghosh, Advocate, Arun Shaw, Advocate, Tanmoy Basu, Advocate, Sambhunath De, Advocate, Soumen Karati, Advocate, Pratik Dhar, Advocate, Arnab Saha, Advocate, Abhimanyu Banerjee, Advocate, Nandini Mitra, Advocate, Debashis Saha, Advocate, Shamim Ahmed, Advocate, Dipika Banu, Advocate, Sabyasachi Roy, Advocate, Ali Ahsan Alamgir, Advocate, Riya Das, Advocate, Rabia Khatoon, Advocate, Kishore Dutta, Advocate, Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Advocate, Suman Dey, Advocate, Iti Dutta, Advocate, Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Advocate, Gourav Das, Advocate, Arabinda Chatterjee, Advocate, Pinaki Bhattacharya, Advocate, Biswarup Biswas, Advocate, Shamim Ul Bari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. - The dispute involved in the present writ petitions, pertains to appointment to the post of primary school teachers in the districts of North 24 Parganas and Malda. The petitioners in W.P. No. 15128 of 2017 (in short, WP-I) and W.P No. 1686 of 2017 (in short, WP-II), participated in the recruitment process of 2009 conducted by the North 24 Parganas, District Primary School Council (in short, DPSC) in terms of the West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2001 (in short, the 2001 Rules). The petitioners in W.P. No. 21997 of 2017 (in short, WPIII) and W.P No. 21533 of 2017 (in short, WP-IV), participated in the same recruitment process conducted by the Malda, DPSC. As identical legal and factual issues are involved in all the writ petitions, the same are taken up for hearing together.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details the facts are that in the year 2009, a recruitment process was initiated for filling up the posts of teacher in primary schools under several DPSCs across the State guided by the 2001 Rules. The petitioners applied for participation and as they fulfilled the eligibility criteria under the 2001 Rules, they were allowed to app

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
            whatsapp-icon Back to top