Back
BISWAJIT BASU
Murari Mohan Misra – Appellant
Versus
Shyama Charan Misra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present second appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff in a suit for eviction of licensees and is directed against the judgment and decree dated March 21, 1996 passed by the Assistant District Judge, District 24-Parganas (Undivided) in Title Appeal No. 53 of 1995 thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated February 28, 1995 passed by the 3rd Court, Learned Munsif, Sealdah, District- 24 Pagranas(Undivided) in Title Suit no. 477 of 1986.
2. One Surendra Nath Mishra was the admitted owner of the premises No. 15 Pravuram Sarkar Lane, Kolkata-700015. The plaintiff claiming to be the adopted son of the said admitted owner filed the said suit for eviction of the defendants from the entire ground floor and one room with one R.T. shed kitchen on the second floor of the said premises, describing them as licensees under him. The defendants are full blood brothers of the plaintiff. The plaintiff in the suit also claimed title over the suit premises on the basis of a deed of gift allegedly executed by the said Surendra Nath Mishra.
3. The defendants contested the said suit on a defence that the plaintiff is not the adopted son of the said Surendra Nath Misra, and the deed
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a valid adoption to be acted upon, including the physical act of giving and taking the minor in adoption. The burden of proo....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove adoption strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, including the con....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
The quality of evidence is more important than the quantity, and witnesses must be given an opportunity to explain any doubts raised about their statements.
The validity of adoption requires clear, cogent evidence of factum, including actual giving and taking; mere documentation is insufficient without proof of the legal requirements.
The court established that for an adoption to be valid under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, there must be clear and convincing evidence of the actual giving and taking in adoption, wh....
A valid adoption under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act cannot be cancelled, and a registered adoption deed carries a presumption of validity unless disproven. Additionally, the burden of proo....
The validity of an adoption must establish consent of both natural parents, failing which the adoption may be considered invalid under Hindu law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
