Back
AMRITA SINHA
Swarnajit Basu – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The aforesaid two applications have been filed for addition of parties in the pending writ petition. The applicants in the aforesaid applications claim to be similarly placed as the applicants in CaN 1 of 2021.
2. The Court, by order dated 19th February, 2021, was pleased to allow CaN 1 of 2021 by adding the applicants therein as party respondents in the writ petition.
3. In the same line, the aforesaid applications for addition of parties stand allowed. The applicants in CaN 2 of 2021 and CaN 3 of 2021 are added as party respondent in the present writ application.
CaN 2 of 2021 and CaN 3 of 2021 accordingly stand disposed of.
4. Learned advocate for the petitioners is directed to amend the cause title of the writ petition accordingly and serve a copy of the writ petition upon the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the added respondents.
CaN 4 of 2022
5. The present interlocutory application has been filed by the writ petitioners praying for an order restraining the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (herein after referred to as the 'Board' for the sake of brevity) from publishing any panel or merit list or recommending or recruiting the candidates having B.Ed qualifi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of maintaining uniformity in the application of recruitment rules and the binding effect of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision on ....
The inclusion of B.Ed. as eligibility for primary level teacher posts is illegal and undermines educational quality, necessitating the prioritization of D.El.Ed qualifications under the Right to Educ....
(1) Elementary education has to be of good quality and not just a ritual or formality – A good teacher is first assurance of quality education in a school.(2) NCTE was not justified in including B.Ed....
The court established that D.El.Ed. is the sole qualification for primary school teachers, invalidating B.Ed. as a qualification and affirming the prospective application of its ruling.
The Supreme Court ruled that B.Ed. is not a valid qualification for primary school teachers, affecting eligibility for appointments made after its decision.
The court upheld that expired selection panels negate candidates' rights to be considered for appointment, asserting invalid qualifications as per Supreme Court directives.
The cancellation of a specific stage of the recruitment process does not necessarily invalidate the entire process, and candidates who consciously participate in the process cannot later challenge it....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
