Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Mahesh Tula – Appellant
Versus
Defence Laboratories Educational Society – Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in prescribing B.Ed, qualification as requisite qualification for the post of P.R.T vide notification issued by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution apart from being contrary to N.C.T.E Regulations and Right to Education Act, 2009 and consequently the candidates who possess D.Ed., qualification like the petitioner are alone entitled for selection and appointment to the post of P.R.T. in the respondent school and the B.Ed., candidates are not eligible for selection and appointment to the post of P.R.T. in accordance with the guidelines issued by the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi with all consequential benefits.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
Higher qualification like B.Ed. (Special Education) not equivalent to prescribed 2-year Diploma unless expressly declared; eligibility strictly per Recruitment Rules as on cut-off date; courts cannot....
The inclusion of B.Ed. as eligibility for primary level teacher posts is illegal and undermines educational quality, necessitating the prioritization of D.El.Ed qualifications under the Right to Educ....
The exclusion of two-year B.Ed. holders from recruitment is arbitrary; advertised minimum qualifications must include all eligible candidates, consistent with NCTE regulations.
Employment and Service matter - Post of contractual Hindi Teacher - Petitioner has got the basic qualification and training qualification along with B.Ed. from Jammu University, his application shoul....
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the process or regulations post-selection, establishing a principle of acquiescence in recruitment law.
The court emphasized the principle of estoppel and upheld the change in policy regarding eligibility criteria and the prerogative of the selection committee to declare the cut off mark in the CBT for....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
