IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ, ARVIND KUMAR VERMA, J.
Bhuneshwar Sahu, S/o. Shri Tarachand Sahu - Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through The Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resource Development (M.H.R.D.), Department Of Education & Literacy Government Of India and Ors. - Respondents
WPS No. 3541 of 2023, WPS No. 5788 of 2023, WPS No. 7344 of 2023
Decided On : 02-04-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging qualifications for teaching positions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. right to education and its constitutional provisions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. supreme court's previous rulings on educational qualifications. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. b.ed. inclusion deemed unlawful by supreme court. (Para 15 , 16 , 36) |
| 5. petitioner arguments against b.ed. qualification. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's affirmation of maintaining quality education standards. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 7. petitions allowed, advertisements quashed. (Para 39 , 40) |
ORDER :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1. Since the identical facts and law are involved in these three writ petitions i.e. WP (S) Nos. 3541 of 2023, 5788 of 2023 and 7344 of 2023 all these cases have been heard jointly and are being disposed off by this common order.
2. Writ Petition Nos.3541 of 2023 and 7344 of 2023 have been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to struck down the impugned Annexure-I of the Scheduled - III of the Chhattisgarh School Education Services (Education Administrative Cadre) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2019 (ANNEXURE P/1) for being arbitrary, illegal, ultra virus and unconstitutional;
10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/quashed the advertisement dated 04.05.2023 to the extent it allows the candidates possessing qualification B.Ed. holders have been declared eligible for the post of primary level teachers (I-V) to participate in it in pursuant to the impugned notification dated 04.05.2023;
10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to struck down the impugned notification dated 28.06.2018 issued by the NCTE (Annexure P/3) for being arbitrary, illegal, ultra virus and unconstitutional;
10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of minutes and proceedings leading to passing of the impugned notification dated 28.06.2018;
10.6 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and allow the only the D.El.Ed. Diploma Holder candidates to be eligible for the post of the Assistant Teacher as was prevalent prior of passing of the impugned notification dated 28.06.2018;
10.7 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to not to treat B.Ed. candidates as eligible for the post of primary level teacher in the advertisement dated 04.05.2023;
10.8 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”
3. Writ Petition No.3541 of 2023 has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
10.2 That, this Hon’ble may kindly be pleased to struck down the impugned Annexure-I of the scheduled-III of the chhattisgarh School Education Services (Education Administrative Cadre) Recruitment and Promotion Rules. 2019 (Annexxure P/1) for being arbitrary, illegal, ultra virus and unconstitutional;
10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kinldy be pleased to set aside/quashed the advertisement dated 04.05.2023 to the extent it allows the candidates possessing qualification B.Ed. Holders have been declared eligible for the post of primary level teachers (I-V) to participate in it in pursuant to the impugned notification dated 04.05.2023;
10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to struck down the impugned notification dated 28.06.2018 issued by the NCTE (Annexure P/3) for be
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
Unni Krishnan, J.P. and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Dilip Kumar Ghosh & others v. Chariman and others
M/s Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd v. Union of India
N.T. Devin Katti and others v. Karnataka Public Service Commission and Others
A.K. Bhatnagar and others v. Union of India and others
Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Umadevi (3) & Ors
The inclusion of B.Ed. as eligibility for primary level teacher posts is illegal and undermines educational quality, necessitating the prioritization of D.El.Ed qualifications under the Right to Educ....
(1) Elementary education has to be of good quality and not just a ritual or formality – A good teacher is first assurance of quality education in a school.(2) NCTE was not justified in including B.Ed....
The court established that D.El.Ed. is the sole qualification for primary school teachers, invalidating B.Ed. as a qualification and affirming the prospective application of its ruling.
The qualifications set by the National Council for Teacher Education are mandatory, and states cannot unilaterally relax these requirements without approval.
The Supreme Court ruled that B.Ed. is not a valid qualification for primary school teachers, affecting eligibility for appointments made after its decision.
The court ruled that differing qualifications for promotion and direct recruitment to the same post violate constitutional provisions and NCTE regulations, affirming B.Ed as essential for lecturer ro....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.