JUDGMENT

Lapita Banerji, J. - By an order dated September 29, 2022 this Court directed a suo moto Rule of contempt to be issued against the respondent no. 4, Kanishk Sinha, appearing in person.

2. The reasons for issuing the suo moto Rule of contempt are briefly as follows. When the court was in seisin of the appeal being FMA 623 of 2022 along with its connected applications, the respondent No.4 filed an application being CAN 3 of 2022 against Mr. Sayantan Basu, the learned counsel representing the appellants.

3. At Paragraph 3 of CAN 3 of 2022, the respondent no. 4/ the contemnor alleged that the learned advocate representing the appellants was asking the parties to give him briefs and money as he was the junior to one of the members of this Bench in seisin of the matter and would be able to obtain favorable orders.

4. Therefore, the contemnor prayed for releasing of the appeal on assignment, being FMA 623 of 2022 from the Bench in seisin.

5. Furthermore, the contemnor also wrote a letter vide electronic mail to the Commissioner of Police, Kolkata alleging that Mr. Sayantan Basu spoke to another fellow advocate regarding hurting and/or killing the contemnor and/or his family members by