IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
LAPITA BANERJI, J.
Liapubam Upendro Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. 18906 of 2022 With W.P.A. 28493 of 2022
Decided on : 04-05-2023.
Recruitment and Service Rules 2015 – Recruitment – Appointment - Appointment of the Private Respondent No.5 as the Director, Eastern Zonal Cultural Centre -Whether a candidate possessed requisite experience in field of art and culture nor could assess whether a candidate possessed requisite administrative experience - Held, In present case this Court finds that discretion used by authorities is beyond jurisdiction and without any reasonable or logical explanation - There is no iota of reason available on records as to need to override decision of Scrutiny Committee by ignoring prescribed rules or procedure as laid down in e-mail by MoC and without referring matter to MoC - Various attempts have been made after filing of writ petition to improve case of EZCC but they are uncorroborated by documentary evidence - Court directs the suitable candidate from the panel recommended by the Joint Secretary, ZCC to be considered for appointment to the post of Director, EZCC by the Executive Board, in consonance with/approval of the Government of India- Petition Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
LAPITA BANERJI, J.
Two writ petitions WPA 18906 of 2022 and WPA 28493 of 2022 were taken up for hearing together. In WPA 18906 of 2022, the writ petitioner challenged the recommendation of the Hon’ble Governor to interview 20 more candidates on May 20, 2022, apart from the 11 short listed candidates. Furthermore, he challenged the recommendation of the Hon’ble Governor dated May 26, 2022 to the Ministry of Culture for appointment of the Private Respondent No.5 as the Director, Eastern Zonal Cultural Centre (EZCC) and also the letter of appointment of the private respondent no. 5, dated July 5, 2022. The petitioner was the second empanelled candidate in the letter of recommendation dated May 26, 2022.
2. In WPA 28493 of 2022, the writ petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for revoking and or rescinding the decision to call the private respondent no. 5 for the interview and for a declaration that the appointment of the private respondent no. 5 is bad in law. He was one of the 20 candidates whose names were recommended by the Hon’ble Governor by a subsequent list.
3. WPA 18906 of 2022 is taken up for consideration first. Common questions of facts and law arise in both the writ petitions.
4. Pursuant to an advertisement dated July 17/23, 2021, the petitioner applied for recruitment to the post of Director, EZCC on short-term contractual basis for a tenure of 3 years which was extendable by another period of 2 years depending upon the performance of the incumbent. The candidates could either apply for appointment on short-term contractual basis or on deputation basis. The eligibility criteria for candidates applying on deputation basis were different from the candidates applying on short-term contractual basis. The eligibility criteria for appointment on short-term contractual basis is as follows:
(i) Eminent cultural personalities (practicing artistes, scholars or experts) in the field of Art &Culture of at least 10 years standing and experience;
(ii) Possessing Bachelor Degree; and
(iii) Minimum of 3 years’ administrative experience in running cultural institution (s).
The eligibility criteria for candidates applying on deputation basis are as follows:-
Officers working in the rank of Director/Deputy Secretary to the Government of India having experience of working in organizations related to Art & Culture:
i. Holding post of regular basis in the pay scale of Rs. 37,400-67,000+GP Rs. 8,700 (pre-revised as per 6th CPC) OR
ii. Having 3 years of regular service in the pay scale of Rs. 15,600-39,100+GP Rs. 7,600 (pre-revised as per 6th CPC).
5. Under the Clause 7.3 of Memorandum of Association and Rules & Regulations of EZCC, the Executive Board had the power to appoint a Search Committee and other committees which may be deemed necessary to assist the Board in furtherance of the objectives of the Society.
6. Under Clause 7.4 (xv) the Executive Board had the power to make appointment in respect of the posts including the post of Director of EZCC. The appointment of Director would have to be made with “prior approval” of the Government of India.
7. Under the bye-laws of EZCC (Recruitment and Service Rules – 2015), the “Executive Board” of EZCC was the “Appointing Authority” of the Director. The Executive Board was required to act in consonance with the Government of India in respect of appointment of the Director.
8. By an electronic mail dated May 12, 2022, the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Culture intimated the Additional Chief Secretary to the Governor of West Bengal about the constitution of a Scrutiny Committee for filling up the post of Director, EZCC. As per the direction of the Ministry of Culture, a 4-member Scrutiny Committee was constituted for scrutiny of applications received in the Office of the Hon’ble Governor of West Bengal/Chairperson of EZCC against the advertisement published for filling up of the post of Director, EZCC. The work of the Scrutiny Committee was to “examine the applications” and “sh
A.P Public Service Commission, Hyderabad and another vs. B. Sarat Chandra and others
B. Amrutha Lakshmi Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai Vs. State of Bihar
Madras Institute of Development Studies & Anr. Vs. K. Sivasubramaniyan & Ors.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and others vs. Rajendra Bhimrao Mandve and others
Madan Lal & Ors. Vs. State of J&K & Ors.
Pradeep Kumar Rai & Ors. Vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences vs. K. Kalyana Raman & Ors.
Raj Kumar and Others vs. Shakti Raj and Others
gpt-4
The court emphasized the presumption of bona fide exercise of power and the reluctance to interfere with the decision of an expert body.
Selection Committees must adhere strictly to their authority without imposing their own policies that disregard eligibility criteria set by governing bodies in the selection process.
A candidate has a right of consideration for a post, and the decision of the authorities not to consider the candidate must be based on sound and bona fide reasons and not mala fide or arbitrary.
Candidates participating in a recruitment process do not have a legal right to appointment if the selection process is found to be flawed and thus invalid.
The legitimacy of employment selections cannot be challenged solely based on familial relationships unless sinister motives or procedural violations are demonstrated.
Selection for public employment must be based on clear, objective criteria, with courts intervening where arbitrary processes are evident.
The appointment of an In-charge Director must follow established procedures and guidelines, and any deviation from these norms, especially influenced by bias or favoritism, renders the appointment in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.