IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
JOYMALYA BAGCHI, SUBHENDU SAMANTA, JJ.
The State of West Bengal & Others - Appellant
Versus
Sahadeb Barman & Others - Respondent
Death Reference No. 1 of 2019 with C.R.A. No. 12 of 2019 (CRAN 1 of 2020)
Decided On : 10-03-2023
{'KEYWORD': 'Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of stolen articles - Identification of stolen articles - Presumption of murder - Death sentence - Mitigating circumstances.', 'SUBJECT': 'Criminal Law', 'ACT_SECTION_LIST': ['302', '392', '411', '34', '109', '65B', '428'], 'SUMMARY': "The prosecution case against the appellants was based on circumstantial evidence. The appellants were carpenters and were seen coming out of the house of the deceased on the night of the incident. Two mobile phones belonging to the deceased, one belonging to his son, golden ornaments of the deceased's wife, and cash were found missing. The post-mortem report opined that the victims had died due to strangulation by ligature. CDRs collected during the investigation showed that a SIM card belonging to one of the appellants was used in the mobile handset belonging to the deceased on the night of the incident. On 17.09.2015, two Samsung mobile sets belonging to the deceased, one of which bore the same IMEI number as the mobile handset used by the appellants, and a Micromax mobile phone belonging to the deceased's son, some of the golden ornaments, ATM cards, and passbooks of the deceaseds were recovered from the residences of the appellants. Pursuant to the disclosure statements of the appellants, on 23.09.2015, the remaining gold ornaments were recovered from the house of one of the appellants. The appellants did not offer any explanation for their possession of the stolen articles soon after the murder. The Court held that the prosecution had proved all the incriminating circumstances beyond doubt and that the circumstances established a complete chain and unerringly pointed to the guilt of the appellants. The Court also held that the murder and theft were committed in the course of the same transaction and that the unexplained possession of the stolen articles by the appellants immediately after the incident would be presumptive evidence of murder. The Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under sections 302/392 IPC read with section 34 IPC. The Court, however, commuted the death sentences imposed on the appellants to life imprisonment without remission for a period of thirty years and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years more for the offence punishable under section 302 IPC and shall suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years more for the offence punishable under section 392 IPC."}
Issues: None
JUDGMENT
Joymalya Bagchi, J.
1. Death reference and criminal appeal have arisen out of the judgment and order dated 25.06.2019 and 29.06.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Siliguri, Darjeeling in Sessions Case No. 01(01) of 2016 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 08 of 2016 convicting the appellants for commission of offence punishable under sections 302/392/411 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to death.
Prosecution Case:-
2. Prosecution case levelled against the appellants is as follows:-
One Pradip Bardhan and his wife Dipti Bardhan and their son Prasenjit Bardhan used to reside at Lelinpur, Shibmandir under Matigara Police Station. Renovation work was going on in their house for some time. One and half months prior to the incident, one Mithun Malakar (P.W. 8) was entrusted with furniture work in the house. He commissioned the work through the appellants. Painting work was also going on in the house. On 15.09.2015 around 9-9:30 a.m., one Biswajit Mondal (P.W. 5) heard the painters were crying “something has happened, something has happened”.
He rushed to the house of Pradip. He found the dead bodies of Dipti and Prasenjit in the sitting room on the ground floor. Reshmi Sen (P.W. 1), married daughter of Pradip was informed. She rushed to the spot. She found the dead bodies of her mother and brother in the sitting room of the ground floor. She also found the dead body of her father in the bathroom of the first floor. She found rope marks around the neck of her mother. She also found a coconut rope tied around the face and neck of her father and a bed sheet was fastened around her brother’s neck. She became senseless. Police arrived at the spot. Upon regaining her senses, Reshmi lodged written complaint which resulted in registration of Matigara Police Station Case No. 580/15 dated 15.09.2015 under section 302 IPC.
3. In the course of investigation, it came to light that a Micromax mobile set belonging to Prasenjit and two mobile sets, i.e., a Samsung mobile set with touch screen and a Samsung mobile set with keypad belonging to Pradip had been stolen. Almirah in the house had been broken and gold ornaments and cash were missing. Investigating officer, Nitesh Lama (P.W. 28) tracked the SIM cards of Pradip Bardhan and Prasenjit Bardhan. SIM card numbers of Pradip were 9232693297 and 9932902053 (which was used by Dipti). SIM card number of Prasenjit was 8145186839.
4. In the course of investigation, investigation officer (P.W. 28) tracked the International Mobile Equipment Identity number (“IMEI? for short) of the hand sets in which the aforesaid SIM cards had been used. He noted that the SIM card of Pradip Bardhan i.e. 9232693297 was used in the mobile hand set bearing IMEI No. 355681050920873 (shown as IMEI No. 355681050920870 in CDRs). Another SIM card bearing No. 8159929187 was also used in the said handset on 14.09.2015 at 22:47:54 hours. The subsequent SIM card was registered in the name of one Sahadeb Barman of Tarijot. It may be pertinent to note one of the stolen mobile phones of Pradip Bardhan bore IMEI No. 355681050920873.
5. On 17.09.2015, P.W. 28 conducted raid in the residence of Sahadeb Barman. He recovered three mobile phones as follows:-
i. 01 (one) Samsung Mobile phone having Model No. GT-C 3303i and IMEI No. 3563631/04/190911/6 with battery and without SIM card;
ii. 01 (one) Hitech Mobile phone having IMEI No. 911402250241383 and 911402250241391 with battery and one SIM card of Airtel having No. 8159929187;
iii. 01 (one) Hitech Mobile phone (X-105) having IMEI Nos. 911342000623847 and 9113420001126345 with battery and a SIM card of Vodafone company.
6. Thereafter, raid was held in the house of Dipu Sutradhar. He recovered the following mobile phones:-
i. 01 (one) Mobile phone of Micromax company having Model No. A106 and IMEI Nos. 911391305054885 and 91139130
Maru Ram vs. Union of India ((1981) 1 SCC 107
Anjan Kumar Sharma And Others vs. State of Assam (2017) 14 SCC 359
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab ((1980) 2 SCC 684
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab ((1983) 3 SCC 470)
Gudda vs. State of M.P. ((2013) 16 SCC 596)
Dana Yadav Alias Dahu And Others vs. State of Bihar (2002) 7 SCC 295
George And Others vs. State of Kerala And Another (1998) 4 SCC 605
Hatti Singh vs. State of Haryana ((2007) 12 SCC 471
Kanti Lal vs. State of Rajasthan ((2004) 10 SCC 113
Limbaji And Other vs. State of Maharashtra ((2001) 10 SCC 340
Mustkeem @ Sirajuddin vs. State of Rajasthan ((2011) 11 SCC 724)
Mohan Lal And Another vs. Ajit Singh And Another (AIR 1978 SC 1183).
State of Rajathan vs. Talevar And Another (2011) 11 SCC 666)
Swamy Shraddananda (2) vs. State of Karnataka ((2008) 13 SCC 767)
Tulsiram Kanu vs. State (AIR 1954 SC 1
Union of India (UOI) vs. V. Sriharan Alias Murugan And Ors. ((2016) 7 SCC 1)
Vijay Kumar vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir ((2019) 12 SCC 791)
The necessity for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in cases relying on circumstantial evidence, and the importance of establishing a clear connection between the accused and the....
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, excluding any possibility of innocence, to sustain a conviction for murder and robbery.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.