Back
ARIJIT BANERJEE, RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Tanuja Begum Laskar – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Arijit Banerjee, J.):
1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated March 29, 2022, whereby the writ petition of the appellant in MAT 468 of 2022, being WPA No. 4584 of 2022, was disposed of. Being aggrieved, the writ petitioner has filed MAT 468 of 2022. MAT 486 of 2022 has been filed by four persons claiming to be members of the concerned Panchayat. The appellant no. 1 in that appeal claims to be the leader of the opposition. The appellants in MAT 486 of 2022 claim that they were necessary parties to the writ petition but were not impleaded as respondents. They were thus deprived of the opportunity of placing their case before the learned Single Judge. By reason thereof, they have suffered prejudice. They have taken out an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated March 29, 2022. We are not inclined to grant such leave. These intending appellants are essentially supporting the appellant in M.A.T 468 of 2022 who has been heard in extenso on several dates. M.A.T 486 of 2022 along with the connected applications are accordingly disposed of.
2. The aforesaid intending appellants in M.A.T. 486 of 2022 have also taken out an
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following statutory procedures and the authority's jurisdiction under the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of compliance with the provisions of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, regarding the removal of elected representatives and the n....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the impugned notices were issued following the procedures contemplated under Section 207 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of Section 12(3) and 12(4) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, regarding the requisition for removal of th....
The legal framework for a no-confidence motion, as outlined in the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 and the Rules, 1994, must be followed, including the prescribed authority's satisfaction ....
Any allegation in a removal notice for the removal of a Pradhan or Upa-Pradhan which may amount to any kind of stigma is not permissible and the notice should simply state that the requisite number o....
Decisions impacting rights of elected representatives must adhere to natural justice, including providing notice and opportunity for hearing.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
