I. P. MUKERJI, BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Prabha Surana – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.P. MUKERJI, J.
INTRODUCTION
1. When the bail application was moved before us on 10th January, 2023, the petitioner was already in custody for 135 days. Investigation was over and charge sheet had been filed. Although, further investigation was contemplated, but any supplementary charge sheet had not been submitted. One co-accused had been granted bail. A special leave petition challenging that bail order SLP (Criminal) Diary No. 33282 of 2022 (Amita Dani and Others vs. Shubhika Surana and Anther), filed by the de-facto complainant was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 31st October, 2022. On these facts on 10th January, 2023 we granted bail to the petitioner.
2. The State of West Bengal was not happy with this order. In fact, they felt aggrieved. They moved the Supreme Court with a special leave petition (Crl.) No. 1981 of 2023. Its appeal was allowed. The Supreme Court passed the following order on 3rd March, 2023, remanding the matter back to us after setting aside our order:
Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Ramendu Chattopadhyay
Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, P. Chidambaram vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Gudikanti Narasimhulu and Others vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Ishwarji Nagaji Mali vs. State of Gujarat and Another
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and Another
Neeru Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs. NCT, Delhi and Another
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chatterjee and Another
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh
Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana (Koli) and Another
Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Nittin Johari and Another
Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others vs. State of Punjab
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the decision to grant bail should consider the seriousness of the charge and the severity of the punishment.
The court established that under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the offence of money laundering is independent of the predicate offence, and the burden of proof lies on the accused to ....
In economic offences, bail is not a right; the burden rests on the applicant to show no risk of interference with justice or likelihood of guilt, reinforced by the position of the accused.
Economic offences of huge magnitude with deep conspiracy and public fund loss require stringent bail denial, prioritizing offence gravity, prima facie evidence, tampering/fleeing risks over custody d....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.