Back
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Sabita Dutta – Appellant
Versus
tate of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceedings of the Asansol (W) Police Station Case No. 12 of 2017 dated 01.02.2017 under Sections 498A/323/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 260 of 2017 pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, District- Burdwan West.
2. The petitioners’ case is that the opposite party no. 2 Tultul Dutta lodged a Complaint Case in the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Asansol under Section 498A/323/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code being Complaint Case No. 05 of 2017 against the petitioners and two others namely Suchitra Purkait and Bipad Taran Dutta stating inter alia that her marriage has been solemnized with one Sri Chittaranjan Dutta in the year 1999 and the husband of the complainant did not demand any dowry but the accuseds no. 1 and 2 started to create pressure upon the petitioner to bring money and assaulted her with fist and blow on 12.03.1999. Thereafter the complainant began to live in E.C.L. quarter. She was also not allowed to participate in the funeral ceremony of her 3rd brother in law and mother
The inherent power of the court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised to quash proceedings in a case where there is no substance in the allegations and no material exis....
The court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash proceedings where the allegations are frivolous or do not disclose any offense, or where the proceedings are an abuse of p....
The court held that the ingredients required to constitute the offences under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code are clearly absent in the present case and the allegations are general and....
In the absence of any specific role attributed to the accused appellants, it would be unjust if the Appellants are forced to go through the tribulations of a trial, i.e., general and omnibus allegati....
General and omnibus allegations of cruelty and harassment under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prevention Act cannot be the basis for initiating criminal proceedin....
In cases where the materials in the case diary and the charge sheet do not prima facie make out a case of cognizable offence against the accused, the proceedings should be quashed.
The court established that specific allegations are necessary to sustain a charge under Section 498A IPC, preventing misuse of the provision in matrimonial disputes.
General and omnibus allegations, without any specific act of cruelty attributed, do not constitute a cognizable offense under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, and proceedings based on such alle....
The judgment established the importance of specific allegations and cautioned against implicating relatives of the husband without prima facie evidence in cases under Section 498A of the Indian Penal....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
