Back
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sk. Firdos Ur Rahaman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and details about parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 31) |
| 2. claiming non-applicability of the act based on product definition. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defining non-liability due to nature of product. (Para 6) |
| 4. procedural violations by market authorities. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. quashing parameters governing judicial review. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. contradictions in applicants' claims and operational jurisdiction. (Para 39 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. discussions about jurisdiction and powers of the market committee. (Para 64 , 66 , 67) |
| 8. final ruling on the revisional application. (Para 75 , 76) |
| 9. judgment dismissing the application and highlighting authority's jurisdiction. (Para 78) |
JUDGMENT :
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.
1. This instant criminal revisional application is preferred for quashing of proceedings of Complaint Case No. 29C of 2012 under Sections 34 (5) and 34(7) of the West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1972 for violation of Section 17A of the said Act pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th Court at Howrah.
2. The petitioners’ case is stated as follows:-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
