The plaintiff successfully proved the delivery of goods and the defendant's liability for unpaid dues, entitling the plaintiff to recover the amount with interest.

JUDGMENT :

Krishna Rao, J.

1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit praying for Decree for a sum of Rs.18,50,257.58 along with interest and interest upon judgment at the rate of 18% per annum.

2. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of retail and wholesale of lead and lead ingots. The defendant is engaged in production and supply of refined lead, lead alloys and lead oxides.

3. The defendant was in need for Lead for its manufacturing process, therefore, the defendant, being aware that the plaintiff is a whole-seller of Lead, approached the plaintiff. After negotiations between the parties, it was agreed that the defendant would place purchase orders upon the plaintiff for supply of lead at specific rates and the plaintiff would supply Lead and raise invoices upon the defendant and thereafter the defendant will make payment in terms of the invoices raised by the plaintiff. It was also agreed between the parties that in the event of delay in making payment, the defendant would make payment of interest at the rate of 18% per annum.

4. On 25th November, 2021, the defendant placed a purchase order upon the plaintiff, for supply of 20,000 MT of Lead which the plaintiff has supplied the same on 28th November, 2021. On the same day, the plaintiff has raised invoice for a sum of Rs. 42,24,400/- on 28th November, 2021.

5. The defendant received the goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff without raising any objection and/or demur in any manner whatsoever.

6. The defendant has made part payment of a sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- on 24th December, 2021 and thereafter the defendant failed to make further balance payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff through her Learned Advocate sent a legal notice to the defendant no 1st March, 2022 calling upon the defendant for making further balance payment of Rs.17,67,248/- along with interest total amounting to Rs. 18,21,282.21. The defendant has received the notice but neither the defendant has sent any reply nor has paid the due amount to the plaintiff.

7. The plaintiff submits that the defendant has also deducted and deposited TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) in respect of the said invoice raised by the plaintiff in acknowledgement of its dues.

8. The plaintiff has filed the suit by obtaining leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 by an order dated 14th June, 2022.

9. The writ of summons was served upon the defendant on 16th September, 2022 but the defendant has not filed written statement. The application filed by the defendant being G.A. No. 3 of 2023 for extension of time to file written statement was dismissed and the suit was placed in the list of “undefended suit”.

10. The plaintiff in order to prove its case has examined one witness, namely, Mr. Anand Kumar Gupta and exhibited 10 (Ten) Documents and are marked as “Exhibit A to Exhibit J”.

Exhibit A – Original Copy of the Power of Attorney, authorising the P.W.1 to give evidence on behalf of the plaintiff company.

Exhibit B – Copy of purchase order dated 25th November, 2021 sent by the defendant to the plaintiff through electronic mail.

Exhibit C – copy of the purchase order dated 25th November, 2021.

Exhibit D and D/1 – Original copy of the tax invoice and containing the seal and signature of the APL Metals Ltd.

Exhibit E – Copy of e-Way bill showing transportation of materials from the factory of the plaintiff to the defendant’s address.

Exhibit F – Copies of bank statements of Kotak Mahindra Bank of the plaintiff.

Exhibit G – Copy of ledger account sent by the defendant to the plaintiff sharing the closing balance amount of Rs. 17,67,248/-.

Exhibit H – Copy of ledger confirmation for the year 2021-22 signed by both t