SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1892 Supreme(Cal) 20

Shuk Lal Poddar – Appellant
Versus
Bikani Mia – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ameer Ali, J. - The question raised in this reference is of such vital importance to the Mahomedans of India and so materially affects their law and religion, the enjoyment of which has been guaranteed to them by the British Government, that I must state at some length the reasons that have compelled me to differ from my colleagues.

2. The facts of the case are as follow:

One Bikani Mia, a Mahomedan inhabitant of Dacca, shortly before his departure in 1874 on a pilgrimage to Mecca, executed a wakfnama in respect of a considerable portion of his property and registered the document in accordance with the law.

The deed recites that the executant was in the full possession of his sense and power of understanding," that he was not indebted to anybody, that the property to which it related was acquired by Bikani himself, and that he had an "exclusive right, ownership and possession therein.

3. The executant then goes on to say--

I now think it advisable to lay down, according to our Mahomedan shara, certain rules in respect of the properties mentioned in the schedule given below, whereby my name and memory may be perpetuated for ever, my sons and daughters and their descendants may b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top