SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1943 Supreme(Cal) 189

PAL, B. K. MUKHERJEA
Gobinda Chandra Ghosh alias G. Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Majid Ostagar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Mukherjea, J. - This appeal is on behalf of defendants 2 and 3 in a suit commenced by the plaintiffs u/s 92, Civil P.C. The suit relates to certain immovable properties situated at Rai Sahib Bazar in the town of Dacca, with regard to which he alleged one Khidir Buksh Khansama to have made a wakf for the upkeep of a mosque built. The plaintiffs are the members of the Mahomedan public who are interested in the mosque, two of them being the brother's grandsons of Khidir Buksh, and the suit was commenced with the sanction of the Collector of Dacca as contemplated by Section 98, Civil P.C. According to the plaintiffs the wakf was created by a towliatnama executed by Khidir Buksh on 9th May 1851, by which the properties specified in sch. A of the plaint were dedicated to the mosque which is itself described as property No. 1 of Sch. B. Another person named Miran who lived in the same locality is said to have dedicated a plot of land to the services of the same mosque by a deed executed on 25th June 1866, and this property has been described in Sch. C of the plaint. The defendants to the suit are three in number; defendant 1 is Akhtar Nabi, a daughter's son of Khidir Buksh wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top