2025 Supreme(Cal) 458
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AT JALPAIGURI
OM NARAYAN RAI, J.
Gobinda Chandra Roy & Ors. - Appellant
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondent
WPA 298 of 2024
Decided On : 10-07-2025
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ekramul Bari, Sr. Adv. Mr. Imtiaj Uddin, Adv., Ms. Rinka Chakraborty, Adv.
For the State Respondent: Mr. Momenur Rahaman, Adv. Ms. Rima Sarkar, Adv.
The court ruled that longstanding contractual employees are entitled to remuneration enhancement and consideration for regularization based on principles established in Supreme Court cases addressing employee rights.
Headnote:(A) Labour Law - Principles governing the regularization of contractual employees - The court referred to the Supreme Court case Uma Devi and clarified the application of its principles to contractual employees engaged for long durations. (Paras 11 and 26)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners are drivers engaged under the RSVY scheme and contend for regularization and increased remuneration following the scheme's termination and subsequent communications regarding their employment status and earnings. (Paras 1-7)
Findings of Court:
Petitioners are entitled to remuneration enhancement as per the latest memorandum and regularization consideration as their employment has been continuous and necessary despite being contractual. (Paras 22 and 23)
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to remuneration enhancements and regularization given their long tenure and continuous service. (Paras 8 and 20)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Supreme Court ruling in Jaggo reinforces the right to regularization for long-serving contractual employees, asserting that continuous and integral service ought to warrant legitimate claims for regularization and equitable treatment. (Paras 20 and 26)
Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for remuneration enhancement and regularization consideration.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment details and remuneration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. contentions of petitioners and respondents (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's analysis of employment rights (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. order for remuneration enhancement and regularization decision (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Om Narayan Rai, J.
1. The case run in the writ petition is that petitioners are drivers who had been engaged in terms of the Rashtriya Sama Vikash Yojana (RSVY) scheme as contractual employees. While the petitioner nos.1, 6, 7 and 8 had been engaged with effect from December 1, 2004, the petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 had been engaged with effect from January 25, 2005.
2. Although the petitioners were engaged as drivers under the District Welfare Health and Family Welfare Samity, Jalpaiguri in terms of the said RSVY scheme for three years, on contract basis, in terms of the order issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Jalpaiguri, yet since the RSVY scheme got terminated on March 31, 2007 i.e. before completion of three years, the petitioners were placed under the Motor Mechanical Unit under the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Jalpaiguri for a period of three years beginning April 1, 2007. It is the petitioners’ case that since April 2007 the petitioners have been rendering continuous service.
3. Under the RSVY scheme, the petitioners were paid only Rs.3000/- per month but subsequently, as per the resolution adopted in the 11th Governing Body Meeting of the District Health and Family Welfare Samity (DH and FW Samity), Jalpaiguri the petitioners’ remuneration was enhanced to Rs.8000/- per month with effect from May 1, 2010 as would be evident from the letter dated April 30, 2010 issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Jalpaiguri and Secretary, District Welfare Health and Family Welfare Samity, Jalpaiguri, to the District Magistrate, Jalpaiguri..
4. Subsequently, upon receipt of a suggestion from the District Magistrate, Jalpaiguri for enhancement of the remuneration of the drivers (including the petitioners), the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Jalpaiguri on January 14, 2011 wrote to the Mission Director (NRHM) & Commissioner (FW) informing the Mission Director that the petitioners along with other drivers were being paid from of the corpus fund of the District Welfare Health and the District Welfare Health and Family Welfare Samity, Jalpaiguri and the said Samity did not have sufficient funds to support such enhancement. Request was made for the District Magistrate, Jalpaiguri to take appropriate steps to “solve the problem”.
5. This was followed by another communication dated September 6, 2012 issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health and Secretary, DH & FW Samity, Jalpaiguri which, inter alia, indicated that out of 53 sanctioned posts for drivers, 29 were lying vacant in the District of Jalpaiguri as on that date. The said letter mentioned the details of 14 contractually engaged RSVY drivers which included the names of the petitioners and recommended for early action in view of the fact that the said drivers demanded enhancement of remuneration and absorption in the department as permanent drivers (Annexure- P4 at page 30 of the writ petition). Copy of the said communication was also marked to the Director of Health Services, West Bengal.
6. Thereafter on April 24, 2017, the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Jalpaiguri followed the matter up with the Director of Health Services, West Bengal referring to an earlier letter dated April 21, 2017 written to the same addressee and requested him to consider the issues of according permanent status of service and enhancement of remuneration (in terms of the Finance Department (Audit Branch) Memo dated February 25, 2016) of the 14 drivers whose names had been mentioned in the earlier communication be. A similar recommendation was also made by the said Chief Medical Officer of health to the Special Secretary, T.D.E Branch by a letter