SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 473

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.
Sanjoy Kumar Doloi and Another – Appellants
Versus
The State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
W.P.A. Nos. 12505, 12512, 12541, 12643, 12713, 12730, 13160, 13457 of 2025
Decided On : 07-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Anindya Mitra, Sounak Ghosh, Sakhawat Khandakar, Swati Jha, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sudipta Dasgupta, Bikram Banerjee, Sondwip Sutradhar, Firdous Samim, Gopa Biswas, Payel Shome, Rishabh Ahmad Khan, Hasanuz Zaman Molla, Moinak Ghosal, Ankita Dey, Subir Sanyal, Ali Ahsan Alamgir, Rabia Khatoon, Soma Mal, Pratik Dhar, Sounak Ghosh, Sakhawat Khandakar, Swati Jha, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee, Pradip Saren, Soumik Ghosh, Saheli Hembram, Shuvro P. Lahiri, R. Naskar, A. Mondal
For the Respondents: Kishore Dutta, Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Biswabrta Basu Mallick, Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Vivekananda Bose, Debanjan Mandal, Sandip Dasgupta, Debayan Sen, Mahima Cholera, Niket Ojha, Akash Dutta, Sayantanee Bhattacharyya, Tapati Samanta, Soumen Chatterjee, K.M. Hossasin, Iti Dutta
For the WBCSSC : Kalyan Kumar Banerjee, Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Rahul Singh
For the WBBSE : Koyeli Bhattacharyya, Bibek Dutta

Only untainted candidates are permitted to participate in the selection process for teaching posts as per Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing adherence to established eligibility criteria.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal School Service Commission (Selection for Appointment to the Posts of Assistant Teachers for Upper Primary Level) Rules, 2025 - Violation of Supreme Court directives - The court disallowed the participation of tainted candidates in the selection process initiated by recruitment notification dated 30th May, 2025, citing previous judgments concerning eligibility. Furthermore, it mandated adherence to the timeline set for recruitment. (Paras 19, 30, 17, 5)

(B) Selection Process - The authority was directed to undertake a fresh selection process for the vacancies identified for the 1st State Level Selection Test, 2016, emphasizing untainted candidates and resolving ambiguities related to eligibility criteria. (Paras 19, 30, 26)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the legality of the recruitment rules and notification issued by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission for filling vacancies, asserting that only untainted candidates from previous tests should be allowed to participate based on prior Supreme Court rulings. (Paras 6, 10, 3)

Findings of Court:
The selection process initiated on May 30, 2025, was upheld, but only untainted candidates were permitted to participate, and timeframes established in previous rulings had to be strictly adhered to. (Paras 30, 31)

Issues: Whether tainted candidates can participate in the selection process initiated by the recruitment notification dated 30th May, 2025 in light of prior Supreme Court judgments. (Paras 19, 20)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that principles outlined in prior judgments specify that the recruitment process must respect eligibility criteria, preventing participation of candidates deemed tainted to ensure a fair selection process. (Paras 19, 30)

Result: Recruitment process upheld with restrictions against tainted candidates.

Table of Content
1. taking record of service documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenge to recruitment rules and notification. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments on recruitment based on supreme court directives. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. arguments regarding eligibility of tainted candidates. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. clarifications on application of previous rulings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. court's considerations on judgment implications. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. assessment of recruitment processes and alterations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
8. issuing directives for selection process adherence. (Para 30 , 31)
9. final judgment and dismissal of petitions. (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.

1. Affidavits-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioners are taken on record.

2. All the writ petitions are taken up for consideration since common issue is involved excluding writ petition being WPA No. 12602 of 2025 (Malati Ghosh & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.).

3. Documents filed in support of depositing Court Fees in respect of writ petitions where number of writ petitioner is more than one are taken on record.

4. In all the matters it has been argued on behalf of the petitioners that they are untainted candidates of 1st State Level Selection Test, 2016 (for short “1st SLST, 2016”) for Classes IX & X and XI & XII..

5. Challenge has been thrown to West Bengal School Service Commission (Selection for Appointment to the Posts of Assistant Teachers for Upper Primary Level of Classes [except Work Education and Physical Education], Classes IX-X and Classes XI-XII) Rules, 2025 (hereinafter referred to as “said Rules of 2025”) and recruitment notification dated 30th May, 2025 issued by the Secretary, West Bengal Central School Service Commission vide memo No.1092/7016/CSSC/ESTT/2025.

6. Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, learned senior advocate representing some of the petitioners submits that in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench dated 22nd April, 2024 and the subsequent judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 3rd April, 2025 read with order passed on 17th April, 2025 on Miscellaneous Application No.709 of 2025 in Civil Appeal No. 4805 of 2025 which was taken out by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education vacancies earmarked for 1st SLST, 2016 are required to be filled up in terms of previous Recruitment Rules of 2016 which were applied for conducting 1st SLST, 2016 for Classes IX & X and XI & XII.

7. Attention of this Court has been drawn to paragraph 363(xi) of the judgment dated 22nd April, 2024 passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench and according to the petitioners West Bengal Central School Service Commission (for short "WBCSSC") needs to undertake a fresh selection process in respect of declared vacancies of 1st SLST, 2016 for Classes IX & X and XI & XII within a specified time.

8. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 3rd April, 2025 (paragraph 45 onwards) wherein it was observed that the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench dated 22nd April, 2024 needs no alteration and it is also contended in consideration of the observations made in paragraph 49 of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 3rd April, 2025 that only untainted candidates and differently-abled candidates ought to be permitted to participate in the selection process which has been initiated by issuing recruitment notification dated 30th May, 2025.

9. It is submitted that there is no express bar in the recruitment notification dated 30th May, 2025 for the candidates who were termed as “tainted” by the Hon’ble Supreme Court from participating in the ensuing selection process for which recruitment notification has been issued on 30th May, 2025. In other words, it is also submitted that notification dated 30th May, 2025 also invited tainted candidates to offer their candidature which is in the teeth of observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the judgment dated 3rd April, 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top