IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Rounak Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of disciplinary proceedings and termination. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on illegality and procedural violations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. response of respondents and procedural justification. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. judicial approach to probation terminations. (Para 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petitions based on substantive assessments. (Para 32 , 33) |
Judgment :
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
1) The two above writ petitions filed by the same petitioner emanates in connection with one purported disciplinary enquiry proceeding, which has been followed by a purported order of termination of the writ petitioner from service. The first one that is W.P.No. 25707 (w) of 2017 was filed to challenge the alleged illegality of the charge sheet issued against the petitioner. In the other one that is W.P.No. 7478 (w) of 2018, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of his termination from service. Hence, both are inter-related and this common judgment effectively decides both.
2) In the selection process started with publication of the vacancy notification in May 2016, the writ petitioner had qualified and wa
State of Bihar vs Gopi Kishore Prasad
Chandra Prakash Shahi vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Dipti Prakash Banerjee vs Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences Calcutta & Others
Rajasthan High Court vs Ved Priya
Probationary employees have limited protections under Article 311, permitting non-stigmatic terminations based on suitability assessments without the full rigor of disciplinary proceedings.
If misconduct is the foundation to pass the order, then an enquiry into misconduct should be conducted and an action according to law should follow. But if it is (sic) notice, it is not incumbent upo....
The court upheld the imposition of a minor penalty but set aside the termination, finding it unjust as it was based on the same grounds as the penalty, violating principles of natural justice.
Termination of a probationer based on misconduct requires a formal enquiry; failure to do so renders the termination stigmatic and punitive.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.