Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Lipika Das & Ors. LRs of (Dhirendra Nath Chandra since deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Kakali Dasgupta & Ors. LRs of (Jitendra Nath Dutta since deceased) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajasekhar Mantha, J.
1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in T.S. No. 92 of 1983, dated 28th August, 1995, by the 4th Assistant District Judge, Alipore.
I. FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The appellants are the legal heirs of the original defendants and the respondents are the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, in the suit before the learned Trial Court. They are all decendants of one Late Prafulla Chandra Dutta.
3. Prafulla Chandra Dutta owned two plots of land- one at 86/3/1, Beltala Road, P.S. Bhowanipore, District 24 Parganas and another, at the Northern and Southern parts of the premises no. 7/2/1, Garcha Second Lane, Dover Terrace P.S. Gariahat, District- 24 Parganas. He was a clerk at the P&T department. It is therefore unlikely that he had enough income to buy the aforesaid properties. In a Trust deed of the year 1961 he stated and acknowledged that his wife contributed substantially from her Stridhan in the purchase of the said properties.
4. Prafulla’s wife was Uma Rani. They had 6 daughters namely Roma Rani, Sushama Rani, Bela Rani, Maya Rani, Rina Rani and Deepa Rani. They also had 2 sons Jitendra Nath and Rabindra Nath.
5. For the effective ma
Properties cannot be presumed joint family properties unless proven to derive from sufficient income or surplus of ancestral properties.
Trust properties cannot be alienated by a trustee without specific authority, and mere revenue entries do not confer ownership rights against trust interests.
No court permission is required for a Karta to sell joint family property when such sale is established as for family necessity under Hindu law, even involving minor interests.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of a sale deed executed by the family manager, the entitlement of daughters to ancestral property under the Amended Hindu Succes....
Adverse possession cannot be claimed against trust properties, and trustees are liable for proper management and maintenance of trust accounts.
In joint family property disputes, a guardian may transact on behalf of minors without court sanction, provided sales serve family interests.
The court upheld the trial court's order for a temporary injunction, emphasizing that issues of joint family property versus self-acquisition necessitate thorough examination during trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
