Siyaram Kurre vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Chh) 20

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Siyaram Kurre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Advocate with Mr Amit Verma, Ms. Swati Sood, Mr. Kaushik Mishra, Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastgava, Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Mr. Rohan & Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Devendra Pratap Singh, Dy. A.G. with Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A., Mr. Vaibhav Dhar Diwan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.R. Patankar, Mr. Manoj Mishra, Mr. Ankit Singhal, Mr. Yash Agrawal, and Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocates, Mr. Ramakant Mishra, A.S.G., Mr. Vikash Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Ms. Deepika Kalia, Ms. Astha Shukla & Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, Advocates.

Table of Content
1. writ petitions addressing common legal and factual issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of land acquisition notifications relevant to the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. allegations of fraud against petitioners related to compensation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. jurisdictional challenges regarding the authority of the collector. (Para 9 , 10)
5. interim orders and their implications on the case. (Para 11 , 12)
6. definitions of ‘person interested’ in land acquisition context. (Para 13 , 14)
7. calculation of compensation and relevant guidelines. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
8. factors leading to alleged irregularities in compensation. (Para 19 , 20)
9. interplay of statutory authority and the principle of natural justice. (Para 21 , 22)
10. arc principles applied to determine market value of land. (Para 23 , 24)
11. recommendations from inquiry committee on recovery of compensation. (Para 25 , 26)
12. the necessity for judicial oversight in statutory project applications. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

1. As common question of law and facts are involved in all the aforesaid bunch of Writ Petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Chh) 20

NARENDRA KUMAR VYASSiyaram Kurre – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (25)

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Siyaram Kurre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent