SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.
Texmaco Rail And Engineering Ltd. & Ors.- Appellant
Vs.
State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors. - Respondent
WPCR No. 463 of 2021
Decided On : 14-06-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Monika Thakur, Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Mr. Arshdeep S. Khurana, Mr. Tanvi Sharma, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Aamir Khan and Mr. Mugda Pandey, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Dy. Advocate State General and Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, Govt. Advocate, Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Sr. Advocate along with Dr. Farukh Khan & Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocates.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226, 225 and 227 - Stamp Act - Article 5 © of Schedule 1 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 406, 415, 420 read with Section 34 - Transfer of Property Act - Section 54 - Registration Act - Sections 17 & 18 - PC Act - Section 13(1)(e) - Criminal Procedur Code,1973 - Sections 482, 155(2) , 156(1) , 439 and 482 - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 4(42C) - Cheating and dishonesty – Criminal Breach of trust - Petitioner No.1 is a Chairman of the Adventz Group and other petitioners are Senior Executives of Company - There was a business transfer agreement between petitioners’ company and Simplex Casting Limited which was filed as Annexure P/2 along with writ petition. BTA has various clauses which provide manner, procedure to be followed for execution of BTA, purchase and its consideration. Clause 3 of BTA provides purchase - Consideration for the sale and transfer of the undertaking as a going concern basis shall be a lump sum amount net of working capital utilisation of which shall stand transferred to the purchaser along with the undertaking with condition that there shall be positive net current assets as per sanction terms of the working capital lenders to justify such working capital limits - Held, High Court under the Constitution is a forum for enforcement of fundamental right of a citizen it cannot be denied the power to entertain a petition by a citizen claiming that State machinery was abusing its power and was acting in violation of the constitutional guarantee. Rather it has a constitutional duty and responsibility to ensure that State machinery was acting fairly and not on extraneous considerations - High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 226 in extreme cases - What are such extreme cases cannot be put in a strait- jacket. But the few on which there can be hardly any dispute are if High Court is of opinion that proceedings under TADA were an abuse of process of court or taken for extraneous considerations or there was no material on record that a case under TADA was made out - between parties offence under Sections 406, 420/34 of IPC is not made out against the petitioners - In view of the above discussions, considering the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court - Writ Petition (Cr.) is allowed.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners have preferred the instant Writ Petition (Cr.) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the registration of First Information Report bearing No. 359 of 2021 (Annexure P/1) lodged by respondent No.4 who is the Managing Director of Simplex Casting Limited at Police Station Supela, District Durg (CG) against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. The brief facts as reflected from the writ petition are that the petitioner No.1 is a Chairman of the Adventz Group and other petitioners are the Senior Executives of the Company. There was a business transfer agreement (for short, “BTA”) between the petitioners’ company and Simplex Casting Limited which was filed as Annexure P/2 along with the writ petition. BTA has various clauses which provide the manner, procedure to be followed for execution of BTA, purchase and its consideration. Clause 3 of BTA provides purchase consideration which reads as under:-

    3.1 The consideration for the sale and transfer of the undertaking as a going concern basis shall be a lump sum amount of INR 57,50,00,000 (Indian Rupees Fifty seven crore and fifty lakh only) net of working capital utilisation of INR 30,00,00,000 (Indian Rupees Thirty crore only) which shall stand transferred to the purchaser along with the undertaking with the condition that there shall be positive net current assets as per the sanction terms of the working capital lenders to justify such working capital limits (“Purchase Consideration”).

3.2 Such Purchase consideration shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller in the following manner: (1) INR 25,00,00,000 (Indian Rupees twenty five crore only) shall be paid to the seller by the purchaser in the following manner.

(a) INR 11,55,00,000/-Indian Rupees Eleven Crore Fifty lac only) payable on the effective date by way of electronic transfer/NEFT/RTGS in favour of Bank of Baroda, Emerging Corporate Bank, Pandry, Raipur.

(b) INR 5,50,00,000 (Indian Rupees Five crore fifty lac only) payable on “April 20, 2019, by way of a cheque drawn in favour of The State Bank of India, Commercial Branch, Pujari Chambers, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur.

(c) (i) INR 1,89,00,000 (Indian Rupees One crore eighty-nine lac only) payable on April 29, 2019;

(ii) INR 1,89,00,000 (Indian Rupees One crore eighty-nine lac only) payable on May 4, 2019.

(iii) INR 1,89,00,000 (Indian Rupees One crore eighty-nine lac only) payable on May 10, 2019;

by way of cheques drawn in favour of the seller towards the consideration payable by the seller to Melbrow, represented by the seller to be its full and final settlement amount against termination of Page 4 of 30 the working agreement dated March 25, 2019, entered into by and between the seller and Malbrow, pursuant to which Melbrow shall have no claim of whatsoever nature, neither against the Undertaking, nor against the Purchaser; and

(d) INR 2,28,00,000 (Indian Rupees two crore twenty eight lac only) payable on April 30, 2019 by way of a cheque drawn in favour of the Seller.

(ii) INR 24,00,00,000/- (Indian Rupees twenty four crore only) shall be paid to the Seller by the Purchaser on or before June 15 2019, subject to satisfactory completion of the Diligence Exercise by the Purchaser and such adjustments as may be determined by the Purchaser pursuant to such Diligence Exercise (“Deferred Consideration”); and

(iii) INR 8,50,00,000 (Indian Rupees Eight crore fifty lac only) by way of transfer of the term loan from the bank(s)/lender(s) of the Seller (in respect of which loan such lenders hold an executive charge over the assets of the Undertaking) to the name of the Purchaser being a liability that pertains/relates to the Undertaking. The parties shall make their best efforts to get such term loan transferred in favour of purchaser as soon as practicable.

3.3 Parties agree that the purchase consideration has been determined basis the Management Certified Financial Statement, and is subject to a

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top