JUDGMENT :

ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sunil Pillai, learned counsel, appearing for the appellants. Also heard Ms. Astha Shukla, learned Government Advocate and Mr. Vikram Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State, Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent-Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, learned counsel, appearing for the writ petitioner in W.P. (S) No. 2683/2018 (Manraj Tamboli), as well as Mr. Vinod Deshmukh and Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel, appearing for the intervenors.

2. W.A. No. 244/2022 and W.A. No. 247/2022 are preferred against an order dated 19.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 2683/2018. W.A. No. 322/2022 is preferred against an order dated 19.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 7341/2018.

3. The appellants in W.A. Nos. 244/2022 and 247/2022 were not parties to the writ proceedings. The appellants in W.A. No. 322/2022 were writ petitioners in W.P. (S) No. 7341/2018.

4. W.P. (S) No. 7341/2018 came to be disposed of in the light of the order dated 19.04.2022 passed in W.P. (S) No. 2683/2018.

5. The Dean, Late Lakhiram Ag