REKHA PALLI, RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Tarun Kataria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 06.04.2018 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A No. 1664/2016. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has rejected the original application preferred by the petitioner wherein he had sought appointment to the post of Junior (ECG) Technician.
2. At the outset, the brief factual matrix as is necessary for adjudication of the present petition may be noted.
3. On 27.05.2013, the respondent no.3/Dr. RML Hospital issued an advertisement inviting applications for filling up 15 posts of Jr. (ECG) Technician out of which, 4 posts were reserved for OBC category candidates, to which category, the petitioner belongs. As per the `Scheme of Selection' referred in the aforesaid advertisement, the selection to the posts of Jr. (ECG) Technician was to be made only on the basis of an interview which was to be conducted by a `Selection Committee' constituted by the respondent no. 3-hospital. It was further clarified in the `Scheme of Selection' that in case the number of applications received for a particular post were very lar
Dr. G. Sama v. University of Lucknow (1976) 3 SCC 585
Manish Kumar Shahi v. State of Bihar (2010) 12 SCC 576
Madan Lai v. State of J & K (1995) 3 SCC 486
Manak Lai V. Dr. Prem Chand AIR 1957 SC 425.
Participating without objection in the selection process bars a candidate from later contesting its fairness; procedural adherence in evaluation is crucial for validity.
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
The court upheld that the recruitment rules prohibit women from the post of Platoon Commander, finding the inclusion of excess female candidates unconstitutional and ordering adjustments to the selec....
Eligibility criteria cannot change midway in recruitment unless rules permit; participants estopped from challenging process or others' eligibility after failure without prior protest.
Point of Law : candidates cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. Either the candidates should not have participated in the interview and challenged the procedure or they should have challen....
Candidates participating in recruitment without protest cannot challenge undisclosed skill test criteria post-failure; uniform application negates arbitrariness; no right to relaxation or appointment....
The court affirmed that petitioners, having previously accepted the selection process, were barred from later contesting the methodology due to principles of waiver and acquiescence, despite alleging....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.