RAMESH SINHA, SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Babulal Yadav, S/o Ramkesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Sonu Yadav, W/o Babulal Yadav – Respondent
ORDER :
(Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.)
1. Finding conflict between the judgments rendered by Division Bench of this Court in FAM No.61/2016 (Smt. Devika Joshi v. Shri Deepak Joshi, 2016 SCC OnLine Chh 2145), decided on 22-7-2016, holding that “independent suit under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act of 1955’) would be maintainable for return of stridhan” and another Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Smt. Babita alias Gyatri v. Modprasad alias Pintu Kheersai Patel and others, AIR 2018 Chhattisgarh 40, holding that “application for return of stridhan under Section 27 of the Act of 1955 is not maintainable”, Division Bench of this Court while hearing this F.A.(MAT) No.40/2022 preferred against the judgment & decree dated 23-12-2021 passed by the Family Court, Ambikapur in Civil Suit No.216A/2018, has referred the matter to Hon’ble the Chief Justice to be placed before larger Bench to answer the following stated question: -
2. Pursuant to the order of Hon’ble the Chief Justice (one of us), the mat
Pratibha Rani Versus Suraj Kumar and another
Balkrishna Ramchandra Kadam v. Sangeeta Balkrishna Kadam
S.D. Joshi and others v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay and others
K.A. Abdul Jaleel v. T.A. Shahida
Rashmi Kumar (Smt) v. Mahesh Kumar Bhada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.