Back
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Aasha Lata Soni W/o Shri Durgesh Soni – Appellant
Versus
Durgesh Soni S/o Shri Chhabilal Soni – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the learned Family Court, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.F-118/2019, whereby the application filed by respondent under Section 311 of the CrPC to summon the witness for further cross-examination has been allowed.
2. The application under Section 125 of the CrPC was moved by the petitioner for the grant of maintenance and the same is pending before the concerned Family Court since 2019. The petitioner led her evidence, thereafter, the case was fixed for examination of the witnesses and production of documents. Respondent/husband moved an application under Section 311 of the CrPC along with certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act for re-examination of the petitioner on the ground that certain conversation was recorded on the mobile phone and he wants to cross-examine the petitioner confronting with the conversation recorded on the mobile, and the learned trial Court vide order dated 21.10.2021 allowed the said application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the learned Court below has committed an error of law by allowing t
The right to privacy, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, includes the protection of conversations held in private, and evidence obtained through recording conversations without the k....
Privacy is an essential component of right to life envisaged by Article 21.
Electronic evidence – Right to holding telephone conversation in privacy of one’s home/office without interference can be claimed as a “Right to Privacy”—Telephone tapping/illegal means of collecting....
The right to privacy in matrimonial cases is not absolute and must yield to the right to present relevant evidence for a fair trial.
The right to privacy in matrimonial disputes is not absolute and must balance with the right to fair trial, allowing relevant evidence to be admitted even if obtained through means that raise questio....
Tape recordings made without the knowledge of one party infringe their right to privacy and violate constitutional rights, rendering them inadmissible in evidence for deciding divorce petitions under....
The Family Courts Act permits lenient admissibility of evidence, allowing for tape-recorded conversations without the other party's consent, while upholding privacy rights.
Right to privacy – Section 122 of Evidence Act does not touch upon aspect of right to privacy as envisaged under Article 21 of Constitution – Section 122 of Evidence Act recognises right to a fair tr....
The fundamental right to privacy cannot be construed as absolute and must bow down to compelling public interest. The admissibility of memory card evidence without certification under Section 65-B of....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
