ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the impugned orders dated 13.7.2021 and 8.1.2022 passed by the 1st Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in RCS (HM) No.947/2017, whereby admissibility of conversation between both the parties recorded in Pen Drive and its transcript is declared inadmissible in the evidence.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner has filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce on the ground of cruelty. Respondent filed her written statement. During the examination of petitioner respondent objected to the Pen Drive being exhibited on the ground of infringement of right to privacy of respondent as the said conversation was between respondent and her sister, which was recorded without her knowledge. Vide order dated 13.7.2021 trial Court has denied the admissibility of Pen Drive and its transcript on the ground that the said conversation was incomplete and the said recorded conversation infringes right to privacy of the respondent. Thereafter petitioner filed an application for placing on record the Pen Drive and complete recorded convers