SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1047

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Vibhor Garg – Appellant
Versus
Neha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Adv. Mr. Rishi Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Yashvi Aswani, Adv. Ms. Vrinda Grover, Adv, Amicus Curie Mr. Yash S.Vijay, AOR Ms. Devika Tulsiani, Adv. Mr. Soutim Banerjee, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, the admissibility of secretly recorded conversations between spouses in a divorce proceeding can be considered under certain conditions. The evidence may be summoned to fill lacunae in the case, especially when it is relevant to the dispute and can be authenticated and verified for accuracy.

However, the court's discretion to admit such evidence is guided by principles that balance relevance, authenticity, and the right to privacy. The evidence can be considered after cross-examination of the party who produced it, which allows for testing the genuineness, accuracy, and context of the recordings.

Importantly, the admissibility hinges on satisfying relevant legal tests, such as establishing the authenticity and accuracy of the recordings, and ensuring that the evidence is not manipulated. The court may also consider whether the evidence was obtained in a manner consistent with legal standards, while recognizing that covert recordings made without consent are not per se inadmissible, provided they meet relevance and authenticity criteria.

In conclusion, such evidence can be summoned to fill lacunae and be subjected to cross-examination, but its acceptance will depend on satisfying the relevant legal parameters, including relevance, authenticity, and procedural law, with due regard to the right to privacy and the specific exceptions under the applicable evidentiary provisions.


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case involving divorce and evidence. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments supporting admissibility of covertly recorded evidence in divorce. (Para 4 , 5)
3. privacy considerations in the context of evidentiary rules. (Para 6 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

B.V. NAGARATHNA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present civil appeal has been filed assailing the judgment dated 12.11.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in CR No. 1616 of 2020 (O&M), wherein the High Court has allowed the civil revision petition filed by the respondent herein.

Factual Background:

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife was solemnized on 20.02.2009. A daughter was born out of the said wedlock on 11.05.2011. Due to marital discord between the parties, the appellant filed a divorce petition being CIS No. DMC/405/2017 under Section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 before the Family Court, Bathinda, on 07.07.2017. The divorce petition was subsequently amended and filed again on 03.04.2018.

3.1 When the aforesaid case was listed for evidence, the appellant herein submitted his affidavit of examination-in-c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top