IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
Ashwani Kumar @ Bablu Chouhan, S/o. Tilakram Chouhan - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Dipka, Dist. Korba - Respondent
CRA No. 839 of 2019
Decided On : 15-06-2024
POCSO Act - Conviction and Sentence - U/s 450 of the IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act - 10 years R.I. and fine - Brief facts of the case, Finding of the Court, Issues, Ratio Decidendi, Final Decision
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the appellant's conviction and sentencing under Section 450 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for committing rape on a minor. The prosecutrix reported the incident to the police, and medical examinations confirmed injuries consistent with sexual assault.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecutrix's testimony credible, supported by medical evidence, and held that the appellant was guilty of the offenses charged.
Issues: The key issues included the age of the prosecutrix, delayed lodging of the report, and compliance with procedural requirements under the POCSO Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on medical evidence, witness testimony, and legal provisions to establish the appellant's guilt, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights and dignity of the victim.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the appellant's conviction and sentence.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal arise out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18-04-2019 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Katghora, in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No.09/2018 whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run all the substantive jail sentences concurrently :-
| Conviction | Sentence |
| U/s 450 of the IPC | R.I. for 10 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for two months |
| Under Section 4 of POCSO Act | R.I. for 10 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for two months. |
2. Brief facts of the case are that, the prosecutrix (PW-1) has lodged a written report to the Police Station Dipka on 04-03-2018 against the appellant with the allegation that in the intervening night of 03-03-2018 and 04-03-2018 at about 1:00 a.m. when she had gone to bathroom situated at the courtyard, the appellant jumped inside from the boundary wall, caught her hold from backside, laid her down on the ground and committed rape upon her after removing her clothes. At that time she shouted, then her mother came there and then the appellant fled away by jumping out from the boundary wall. She received injuries on her left hand and right leg. When her father came from his duty in the morning, she informed him about the incident and then she came to lodge the report along with her family members. Based on her written report Ex.-P/1, FIR Ex.-P/2 was registered on 04-03-2018 for offence under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short ‘POCSO Act’). The prosecutrix was sent for her medical examination to Community Health Center, Katghora, where Doctor Smt. Beratha Tigga (PW-9) has examined her and gave her report Ex.-P/4. While examining the prosecutrix, the doctor has found following injuries on the body of the prosecutrix:-
(ii) swelling present on right forearm below elbow joint 2 x 2 cm.
(iii) multiple bruises present over left forearm
(iv) bluish skin scratch present on right thigh backside
(v) redness and swelling present on right thigh later side
(vi) scratch present over chest over right region.
The doctor opined that sexual intercourse took place on the girl. The prosecutrix was referred for X-ray examination for determination of her age. Two slides of her vaginal swab were prepared and handed over to the police. The pubic hair of the prosecutrix was also taken, sealed and handed over to the police for FSL examination. The underwear of the prosecutrix was seized vide seizure memo Ex.-P/5. The spot map Ex.-P/7 was prepared. With respect to the age of the prosecutrix her achievment record of Class Vth has been seized vide seizure memo Ex.-P/6 in which her date of birth is recorded as 22-08-2004. The certificate of school admission and discharge has been seized by the police from Beacon English Higher Secondary School, Shakti Nagar, Gevra which is Ex.-P/16, in which also the date of birth of the prosecutrix is recorded as 22-08-2004. The prosecutrix was sent for her X-ray examination for age determination to Indira Gandhi District Hospital, Korba where Doctor Dilish Singh (PW- 11) has examined her and gave his report Ex.-P/17. After examination of X-ray report the doctor has opined that age of examined person by X-ray is above 12 years, but below 14 years. The appellant was arrested on 05-03-2018 and he too was sent for his medical examination to Community Health Center Dipka where Doctor Kamlesh Singh Porte (PW-6) has examined him and gave his report Ex.-P/13. While examining the appellant the doctor has found him capable to perform sexual intercourse. The underwear of the appellant has also been seized vide seizure memo Ex.-P/11. The seized articles including slides of vaginal swab of the prosecutrix was sent for FSL examination to regional FSL Bilaspur. The statemen
Ramdeo Chauhan alias Raj Nath Vs. State of Assam
State of Punjab v. Gumit Singh
The judgment emphasizes the importance of protecting the rights and dignity of victims of sexual offenses, highlighting the credibility of the prosecutrix's testimony and the significance of medical ....
The conviction for rape and trespass was upheld based on credible witness testimony, and the sentence was reduced considering the time elapsed since the crime.
Rule 12 is strictly applicable only to determine age of a child in conflict with law.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the court must consider the reliability of the victim's testimony, the presence of serious laches in the prosecution case, and the age....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the age of the prosecutrix and the reliability of her testimony beyond reasonable doubt, along with th....
The conviction of the appellant was quashed due to insufficient and inconsistent evidence, demonstrating the necessity for reliable testimonies in criminal cases, especially under sexual offence laws....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.