Back
RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Laxmi Barve W/o Late Bhagbali Barve – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is arising out of the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 16.01.2003 passed by Learned Special Judge and First Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Special Sessions Case No. 06/1998, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 hereinafter called as (Act of 1988) and sentenced him in the following manner with the direction to run the sentence concurrently:-
| S.L. | Conviction | Sentence |
| 1 | U/s 7 of the Anti Corruption Act. (Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988) | R.I. for 2 years and fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of fine additional R.I. for 3 months. |
| 2 | U/s 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Anti Corruption Act. (Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988) | R. I. For 4 years and fine of Rs. 3000/- in default of fine additional R.I. for 6 months. Both sentences shall run concurrently. |
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was working as Patwari and was posted at Patwali Halka No. 41, Motimpur Kala Circle, Kharora District- Raipur. The sister of the complainant namely Paraniyabai was the owner of certain la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
