SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Chh) 209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, C.J., Rajani Dubey, J.
Smt. Padmavati Sahu W/o Shri Lalit Sahu and ors. –Petitioners
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Women And Child Development and ors. – Respondents
WPS No. 803 of 2022, WPS No. 5149, 5595, 6031, 6295, 9138 of 2023, WPS No. 272 of 2024
Decided On : 09-05-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Ms. Renu Kochar, Mr. Ratnesh Agrawal, Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. R.S.Marhas, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Animesh Tiwari and Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocates.
For the Intervenor :Mr. Jitendra Kumar Saxena, Advocate.

Rules limiting the age for promotion of Anganwadi Workers to 45 years were upheld, deemed not arbitrary or unconstitutional, while upholding the State's authority under Article 309 to regulate recruitment practices.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Article 309 - Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Special Provision for Appointment of Women) Rules, 1997 - Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department Executive Class III (Non-Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 2008 and 2023 - Writ petitions challenging various rules related to the upper age limit of 45 years for Anganwadi Workers seeking promotion to Supervisor posts - Petitioners claimed rules were unconstitutional and violated principles of fairness. (Paras 1, 2, 10, 37, 54)

(B) Legal Principles - The petitioners contended that the age limitation of 45 years is arbitrary and unreasonably bars experienced Anganwadi Workers from promotion opportunities - It was argued that the guidelines from the Union of India regarding recruitment were not adhered to, which suggests promotions for qualified Anganwadi Workers. The rules were defended by the State as legislative matters that cannot be deemed unreasonable unless manifestly arbitrary. (Paras 40, 41, 48)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, working as Anganwadi Workers for 10 to 25 years, challenged amendments limiting the age for limited direct recruitment of Supervisors to 45 years, which disqualified many from participating in the recruitment process after the State had a long gap without recruitment opportunities. They argued for adherence to guidelines suggesting 50% of vacancies be filled through promotion based on experience instead. (Paras 9, 39, 54)

Findings of Court:
The court found no grounds to declare the rules unconstitutional, affirming the legitimacy of the 45-year age limit as consistent with policy decisions of the State. The burden of proving rules violated fundamental rights lay with the petitioners, who failed to establish arbitrariness or unreasonableness. The court noted the State should consider providing some relief for long-serving individuals who might have crossed the age limit. (Paras 46, 54)

Issues: The primary issues were whether the age limitation of 45 years for Anganwadi Workers seeking promotion was arbitrary and unconstitutional, and whether the rules conformed to guidelines issued by the Ministry of Women and Child Development regarding promotion opportunities. (Para 40)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that recruitment and conditions of service under Article 309 allow States to set reasonable limits, which in this context included the age limit. The enforcement of such regulations, unless proven manifestly arbitrary, falls within administrative discretion. The court also suggested the State might explore options to address the grievances of those impacted by age restrictions. (Paras 49, 54)

Result: The petitions were dismissed, with the court encouraging the State to consider formulating a scheme for those affected by the age limit. (Para 54)

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, C.J.

1. Since similar facts and issues are involved in these petitions, they are being considered and decided by this common judgment.

2. The petitioners {in WPS No. 803 of 2022}, have prayed for the following reliefs:

    “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call entire record from the respondents.

    10.1-A That, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the present petition and issue writ declaring the impugned Rule 12(3) of the Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department, Executive Class III (Non- Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 2008 ultra vires and unconstitutional

    (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and issue a writ quashing impugned amendment dated 28.07.2008 in Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Special Provision for Appointment of Women) Rules 1997 (Annexure P-1) as ultra vires, in the interest of justice.

    Alternatively.

    That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and issue a writ reading down the impugned amendment dated 28.07.2008 in Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Special Provision for Appointment of Women) Rules, 1997 (Annexure P-1) to the effect that this impugned rule will have no application in the recruitment of Aaganbadi Supervisor in respect of direct recruitment amongst the Anganbadi Workers as this recruitment though direct in the nomenclature is actually is on the basis of seniority, in the interest of justice.

    (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”

3. The petitioners {in WPS No. 5149 of 2023}, have prayed for the following reliefs:

    “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of quashing the impugned amendment of 2008 and declaring proviso inserted in rule 4 by way of amendment of 2008 Annexure P/5 as ultra vires.

    10.1-A That, the Rule 8(1)(j) and 8(2) of the Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department, Executive Class III (Non-Gazette) Service Recruitment Rules 2023 Annexure P/7 is ultra vires and unconstitutional.

    10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent authorities to allow petitioners to participate in recruitment process.

    10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may be further pleased to pass any other consequential and other orders/ writs which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

4. The petitioner {in WPS No. 5595 of 2023}, have prayed for the following reliefs:

    “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of Certiorari against the respondents and declare the Rule 6(1)(b) of the Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department Executive Class III (Non-Gazetted) Service Rules of 2023 (Annexure P/1) as ultra vires.

    10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly pass any order/direction quashing the Rule 6(1)(b) of the Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department Executive Class III (Non-Gazetted) Service Rules of 2023 and declare that the Limited Direct Recruitment of Supervisor under rule 6(1)(b) of the Rules of 2023 as illegal and against the law.

    10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly pass order/ direction quashing the employment notice (Annexure P/2) issued by respondent No. 5 with regard to recruitment for the 220 posts of Supervisors from amongst Anganwadi Workers by Limited Direct Recruitment.

    10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly pass order / direction stopping the recruitment process initiated under the employment notice for the post of Supervisors by limited direct recruitment to ill 220 posts of Supervisors from amongst Anganwadi Workers.

    10.5 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly issue order / direction in nature of writ of mandamus to the Respondent No. 1 i.e. State of Chhattisgarh to amend the Chhattisgarh Women and Child Development Department Executive Class III (Non-Gazetted) Service Rules of 2023 in accordance with the guidelines of respondent No. 2 Uni

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top