Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Tanu Construction through Proprietor Shri Devtanu Chakravarti – Appellant
Versus
Nand Kishore Patel, S/o Khirsagar Patel – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Goutam Bhaduri, J.
Heard.
1. The bunch of appeals are preferred under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (for short ‘the Act, 2016’) proposing the following substantial question of Law :-
B. Whether both the courts below are justified in allowing the application/ complaint of the applicant?
C. Whether the learned Tribunal is justified in not holding the fact that the case was not maintainable before any authority under RERA act in view of the agreement dated 29.06.2022.
D. Whether the learned Appellate Tribunal was justified the holding the fact that the complain was not maintainable before RERA because the agreement was much prior before commencing of RERA Act.”
2. The facts of this case are that against the order passed by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (for short ‘the RERA’)
The main legal point established in the judgment is that ongoing real estate projects, which commenced prior to the Act and had not received a completion certificate, fall under the purview of the Re....
The judgment established the unconditional right of the allottee to seek refund and the application of promissory estoppel in enforcing promises made by the promoter.
The main legal point established is that the Real Estate Regulation & Development Act, 2016 operates retrospectively, and the levy of interest for delay is compensatory in nature, aligning with the r....
Landowners do not qualify as 'promoters' under the Act post-divestment; complaints against them were not maintainable.
The court upheld the requirement for total deposit of compensation and interest before hearing appeals under the Real Estate Act, affirming RERA's jurisdiction over disputes involving landowners as a....
Projects receiving partial occupancy certificates prior to enactment are exempt from certain provisions of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article