SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Chh) 296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY, J.
Dr. Bijaya Ketan Sahu, S/o. Shri Sahdev Sahu and Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare and Ors. – Respondents
WPS No. 453 of 2013
Decided On : 03-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. J.N. Nande, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Raghvendra Verma, G.A., Mr. Anupam Dubey, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal of appointment orders based on the non-inclusion of the petitioners' post graduate degrees in the Schedule 2 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 was not justified as the universities were running their degree courses after due approval from the CCIM as per provision under Section 13A of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.

Headnote:

Appointment Orders - Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Section 13A - Summary: The court addressed the refusal of appointment orders to the petitioners for the post of Lecturer (Shalya Tantra) and the requirement of post graduate qualification in the subject/Specialty concerned included in the Schedule 2 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. The court found that the petitioners' degrees were obtained from universities not included in Schedule 2, but after examining the documents, it was concluded that the universities were running their degree courses after due approval from the CCIM as per provision under Section 13A of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. The court directed the respondent authorities to issue appointment letters in favor of the petitioners as per the advertisement dated 02.09.2009.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought appointment orders for the post of Lecturer (Shalya Tantra) after being placed in the waiting-cum-merit list. The respondent authorities refused to issue the appointment orders citing that the petitioners' post graduate degrees were not included in the Schedule 2 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners' degrees were obtained from universities not included in Schedule 2, but after examining the documents, it was concluded that the universities were running their degree courses after due approval from the CCIM as per provision under Section 13A of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. The court directed the respondent authorities to issue appointment letters in favor of the petitioners as per the advertisement dated 02.09.2009.

Issues: The main issue was the refusal of appointment orders to the petitioners based on the non-inclusion of their post graduate degrees in the Schedule 2 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the universities from which the petitioners obtained their degrees were running their degree courses after due approval from the CCIM as per provision under Section 13A of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, and therefore directed the respondent authorities to issue appointment letters in favor of the petitioners.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent authorities to issue appointment letters in favor of the petitioners as per the advertisement dated 02.09.2009.

ORDER :

1. Heard on admission.

2. Admit.

3. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners against the action on the part of the respondent authorities whereby the appointment orders were not issued in favour of the petitioners. It is also prayed that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider the representation made by the petitioners with regard to appointment on the post of Lecturer (Shalya Tantra).

4. Brief facts of the case as mentioned in the petition, are that petitioner No.1-Dr. Bijaya Ketan Sahu passed Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery from Sambalpur University, Burla (Orrisa) in the year 1996 and completed his post graduation M.S. (Ayurved) in Shalya Tantra from the Utkal University Bhubaneswar (Orissa) in the year 2001. After obtaining Master of Surgery (Ayurved) degree, petitioner applied for registration of additional qualification and on 23.09.2009, the Registrar of Orissa State Council of Ayurvedic Medicine issued a registration certificate of additional qualification of Master of Surgery (Ayurved) degree.

5. Petitioner No.2- Dr. Prashant Lingaram Rasale passed Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery from Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nasik (M.S.) in the year 2003 and completed his post graduation (Ayurved Vachaspati) M.S. in Shalya Tantra from the University of Mumbai in the year 2008. After obtaining Master of Surgery (Ayurved) degree, petitioner No.2 applied for registration of additional qualification and on 25.08.2008, the Registrar of Maharashtra Council of Indian Medicine issued a registration certificate of additional qualification of Master of Surgery (Shalya Tantra) degree. The Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Raipur issued an advertisement (Annexure P/1) on 02.09.2009 bearing No. 04/2009/Chayan dated 27.08.2009 whereby applications were invited for the post of Lecturer and Reader in Government Aayurvedic College as well as Senior Scientific Officer Grade-2 in Health and Family Welfare Department. In the above said advertisement, the requisite qualification, age limit, mode of selection pay scale and other important information were also mentioned. The petitioners applied for the post of Lecturer, published in the said advertisement and after the interview, the petitioners were placed at serial No.3 & 4 in the waiting-cum-merit list issued by the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur and one Dr. Balendra Singh has been selected on the post of Lecturer (Shalya-Tantra). Being aggrieved by the selection of Dr. Balendra Singh, the petitioner No.1-Dr. Bijaya Ketan Sahu preferred a writ petition i.e. W.P.(S) No.3088/2011 alleging that the post graduation degree of Dr. Balendra Singh was not registered in the State Council of Indian Medicine Board and the post graduation registration certificate was not registered with the State Council/ Board of the Indian Medicine at the time of submission of the application form. Vide order dated 21.03.2012 (Annexure P/2), this Court allowed the said petition to some extent and a direction was issued to P.S.C. to prepare a fresh select list for the post of Lecturer (Shalya Tantra) of other candidates other than respondents No.4 & 5, after considering all the aspects of the matter including the qualification of the candidates. In compliance of the said order, the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur issued a fresh select list for the post of Lecturer in Shalya Tantra after considering the qualification of the candidates vide notification dated 27.04.2012 (Annexure P/3). The fresh Select-list dated 27.04.2012 was not challenged by any party before any Court of law. The CGPSC, Raipur informed the petitioners about their selection on the post of Lecturer (Shalya Tantra) on 08.05.2012 (Annexure P/4). The petitioners obtained their post graduation degrees from respective Universities which were recognized by the University Grants Commission, CCIM and D

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top