SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Chh) 570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ., Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Govt. Of India, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi and ors. – Appellants
Versus
Ultratech Cement Limited and ors. - Respondents
WA No. 448 of 2024, WA No. 432 of 2024
Decided On : 12-08-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General alongwith Mr. Bhupendra Pandey, Ms. Anmol Sharma, Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Mr. Rishabh Deo Singh, Standing Counsel, Mr. Ravindra Shrivastava and Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Senior Advocates, assisted by Ms. Devangna Singh, Ms. Sanya Shukla, Ms. Krati Dubey and Ms. Selina Raj, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. P. Chidambaram and Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocates, assisted by Ms. Mukta Dutta, and Mr. Rahul Ambast, Advocates, Mr. Ravindra Shrivastava and Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Senior Advocates, assisted by Ms. Devangna Singh, Ms. Sanya Shukla, Ms. Krati Dubey and Ms. Selina Raj, Advocates., Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocates. Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General alongwith Mr. Bhupendra Pandey, Ms. Anmol Sharma, Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Mr. Rishabh Deo Singh, Standing Counsel.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, mandating that parties affected by administrative decisions must be afforded an opportunity to be heard.

Headnote:

(A) Private Siding Policy, 2016 – Clause 19 – Private Freight Terminal (PFT) Policy, 2020 – In Principle Approval (IPA) dated 08.04.2021 granted to M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. quashed for failure to afford Ultratech Cement Ltd. an opportunity to be heard, violating principles of natural justice. The learned Single Judge held that the Railways must consider the application afresh after hearing Ultratech Cement Ltd. (Paras 10, 48, 49)

(B) Natural Justice – Requirement of hearing – The court emphasized that parties whose rights are affected must be given a fair chance to present their case before any decision is made. (Paras 48)

Facts of the case: The appeals arose from the quashing of an IPA allowing M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. to set up a PFT, which Ultratech Cement Ltd. contested, claiming it was not consulted despite being the owner of the private siding. (Paras 2, 10)

Findings of Court: The court found that the IPA was granted without due process, infringing Ultratech Cement Ltd.'s rights, and thus quashed the IPA while allowing for reconsideration with proper hearings. (Paras 10, 48)

Issues: The main issues included whether the Railways were required to hear Ultratech Cement Ltd. before granting the IPA and the implications of the Private Siding Policy on the IPA. (Paras 10, 48)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the principles of natural justice necessitate that parties affected by administrative decisions must be afforded an opportunity to be heard, particularly when their rights are at stake. (Paras 48)

Result: Appeals dismissed. (Paras 50)

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, CJ.

1.Since both the appeals arise out of the order dated 09.05.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge in WPC No. 2989/2021, they are being considered and decided by this common judgment.

2.WA No. 448/2024 has been filed by the appellant-Union of India which is represented through Ministry of Railways and WA No. 432/2024 has been filed by M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. who was respondent No. 5 in WPC No. 2989/2021. Ultratech Cement Ltd. was the writ petitioner in WPC No. 2989/2021, which had sought quashing of the In Principle Approval (for short, the IPA) dated 08.04.2021 and any other permission or approval to further process application made by appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. being dated 09.02.2021 granted by the respondent-Senior Divisional Operation Manager, for the purported Greenfield PFT under the 2020 PFT policy including any permission or approval granted by by the South East Central Railway for use of Hathband Private Siding, as being arbitrary and illegal.

3.There is a delay of 5 days in filing WA No. 448/2024 for which IA No. 1 of 2024 has been filed. For the reasons stated therein, delay is condoned.

4.The learned Single Judge, after hearing the parties at length, allowed the petition and quashed the IPA dated 08.04.2021 granted in favour of M/s. Shree Cement Ltd., however, liberty was also granted to the respondents No. 3 and 4/Railways to consider the application moved by the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. for setting up Greenfield PFT and for grant of IPA afresh, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the Ultratech Cement Ltd.

5.The facts, in brief, are that the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of mining of limestone and manufacture of cement. One of its cement plants is located at village Khapradih, Tehsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara. At present, the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. transports cement from its plant by road for approximately 25 KMs to the Hathband Railway siding, Raipur Division of the Respondent No. 4 South East Central Railways (SECR), from where its cement is transported across the country through railways. Ultratech Cement Ltd. is also a company also engaged in the business of manufacture of cement. Sometime in the year 2000, it constructed two private railway sidings, connecting the main railway Howrah- Mumbai railway line to its cement manufacturing plants at Hirmi and Rawan in District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, which takes off at the Hathband Railway Station with a single line of railway track laid down by Ultratech Cement Ltd. These two private sidings are governed by Private Siding Agreements (for short, PSA) dated 01.02.2008 and 10.08.2010 respectively entered between the Railway Administration and Ultratech Cement Ltd. The terms of the agreements would show that the Railway Administration has the overriding right of control and supervision of the use of the private siding of Ultratech Cement Ltd.

6.The private siding of Ultratech Cement Ltd. consists of more than 17 KMs of railway track connecting its factory premises at Hirmi and Rawan with the Hathband Railway Station on the Indian Railway network. The real value of the private siding lies in the connectivity to the Railways Network and the access that it provides to the 1.08 lakh KMs of Indian Railways Rail network spreading across the length and the breadth of the country. Ultratech Cement Ltd., in its income tax appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning this very private siding at Hirmi in M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. ACIT-2 Mumbai {2017 SCC OnLine ITAT 52 paragraph para.12} admitted the benefit (characterized as a profit) that it (as an assessee) receives as a private siding owner as follows: that by way of such operation of rail systems, it has been able to save the expenses for loading lat those plants) into the trucks, road freight and expenses for unloading and loading the same at the site of nearest Indian railways and that resulted into

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            Judicial Analysis

            AI

            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top