IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ., Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Govt. Of India, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi and ors. – Appellants
Versus
Ultratech Cement Limited and ors. - Respondents
WA No. 448 of 2024, WA No. 432 of 2024
Decided On : 12-08-2024
(A) Private Siding Policy, 2016 – Clause 19 – Private Freight Terminal (PFT) Policy, 2020 – In Principle Approval (IPA) dated 08.04.2021 granted to M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. quashed for failure to afford Ultratech Cement Ltd. an opportunity to be heard, violating principles of natural justice. The learned Single Judge held that the Railways must consider the application afresh after hearing Ultratech Cement Ltd. (Paras 10, 48, 49)
(B) Natural Justice – Requirement of hearing – The court emphasized that parties whose rights are affected must be given a fair chance to present their case before any decision is made. (Paras 48)
Facts of the case: The appeals arose from the quashing of an IPA allowing M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. to set up a PFT, which Ultratech Cement Ltd. contested, claiming it was not consulted despite being the owner of the private siding. (Paras 2, 10)
Findings of Court: The court found that the IPA was granted without due process, infringing Ultratech Cement Ltd.'s rights, and thus quashed the IPA while allowing for reconsideration with proper hearings. (Paras 10, 48)
Issues: The main issues included whether the Railways were required to hear Ultratech Cement Ltd. before granting the IPA and the implications of the Private Siding Policy on the IPA. (Paras 10, 48)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the principles of natural justice necessitate that parties affected by administrative decisions must be afforded an opportunity to be heard, particularly when their rights are at stake. (Paras 48)
Result: Appeals dismissed. (Paras 50)
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1.Since both the appeals arise out of the order dated 09.05.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge in WPC No. 2989/2021, they are being considered and decided by this common judgment.
2.WA No. 448/2024 has been filed by the appellant-Union of India which is represented through Ministry of Railways and WA No. 432/2024 has been filed by M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. who was respondent No. 5 in WPC No. 2989/2021. Ultratech Cement Ltd. was the writ petitioner in WPC No. 2989/2021, which had sought quashing of the In Principle Approval (for short, the IPA) dated 08.04.2021 and any other permission or approval to further process application made by appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. being dated 09.02.2021 granted by the respondent-Senior Divisional Operation Manager, for the purported Greenfield PFT under the 2020 PFT policy including any permission or approval granted by by the South East Central Railway for use of Hathband Private Siding, as being arbitrary and illegal.
3.There is a delay of 5 days in filing WA No. 448/2024 for which IA No. 1 of 2024 has been filed. For the reasons stated therein, delay is condoned.
4.The learned Single Judge, after hearing the parties at length, allowed the petition and quashed the IPA dated 08.04.2021 granted in favour of M/s. Shree Cement Ltd., however, liberty was also granted to the respondents No. 3 and 4/Railways to consider the application moved by the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. for setting up Greenfield PFT and for grant of IPA afresh, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the Ultratech Cement Ltd.
5.The facts, in brief, are that the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of mining of limestone and manufacture of cement. One of its cement plants is located at village Khapradih, Tehsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara. At present, the appellant-M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. transports cement from its plant by road for approximately 25 KMs to the Hathband Railway siding, Raipur Division of the Respondent No. 4 South East Central Railways (SECR), from where its cement is transported across the country through railways. Ultratech Cement Ltd. is also a company also engaged in the business of manufacture of cement. Sometime in the year 2000, it constructed two private railway sidings, connecting the main railway Howrah- Mumbai railway line to its cement manufacturing plants at Hirmi and Rawan in District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, which takes off at the Hathband Railway Station with a single line of railway track laid down by Ultratech Cement Ltd. These two private sidings are governed by Private Siding Agreements (for short, PSA) dated 01.02.2008 and 10.08.2010 respectively entered between the Railway Administration and Ultratech Cement Ltd. The terms of the agreements would show that the Railway Administration has the overriding right of control and supervision of the use of the private siding of Ultratech Cement Ltd.
6.The private siding of Ultratech Cement Ltd. consists of more than 17 KMs of railway track connecting its factory premises at Hirmi and Rawan with the Hathband Railway Station on the Indian Railway network. The real value of the private siding lies in the connectivity to the Railways Network and the access that it provides to the 1.08 lakh KMs of Indian Railways Rail network spreading across the length and the breadth of the country. Ultratech Cement Ltd., in its income tax appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning this very private siding at Hirmi in M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. ACIT-2 Mumbai {2017 SCC OnLine ITAT 52 paragraph para.12} admitted the benefit (characterized as a profit) that it (as an assessee) receives as a private siding owner as follows: that by way of such operation of rail systems, it has been able to save the expenses for loading lat those plants) into the trucks, road freight and expenses for unloading and loading the same at the site of nearest Indian railways and that resulted into
BALCO Employees' Union (Regd.) v. UOI & Ors
M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. Jabalpur vs Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited & Ors
M/s Radhakrishna Agarwal & Ors v. State of Bihar & Ors
Modern Insulators Ltd. V. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd
P.D Agrawal v. State Bank of India & Ors (2006) 8 SCC 776
Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corpn. v. Diamond & Gem Development Corpn. Ltd.
State of Gujarat & Ors v. Meghji Petraj Shah Charitable Trust & Ors
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Sudhir Kumar Singh & Ors.
The Fruit & Vegetable Merchants Union v. The Delhi Improvement Trust
AI
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, mandating that parties affected by administrative decisions must be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
Railways cannot grant usage rights for a private siding without the owner's consent, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
The operation of a railway siding without proper pollution controls is a violation of environmental regulations, necessitating compliance with the Air Act and adequate infrastructure to mitigate envi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the involvement of a private party in a tender process can be justified if it aims to ensure the uninterrupted supply of essential goods, and ....
The PPE Act allows for eviction of unauthorized occupants, but due process and natural justice must be observed in such proceedings.
Other principle that has been ingrained is that if a project is beneficial for the larger public, inconvenience to smaller number of people is to be accepted. It has to be respectfully accepted as a ....
Point of Law : Notification cannot be construed as having retrospective or retroactive effect to whittle down the accrued rights in favour of the Respondent units which were entitled to rebate.
The court declared the notification extending environmental clearances for mining projects unconstitutional, citing lack of public consultation and violation of statutory procedures under the Environ....
The court affirmed that environmental clearances' validity cannot be extended without expert assessment, deeming amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment notification unconstitutional.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.