Back
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Hetram Nayak, S/o Anand Kand Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through District Magistrate – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the relationship context leading to murder. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discovery and forensic evidence of homicide. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. integration of witness testimony and evidence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments against conviction based on evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. assessment of circumstantial evidence. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. challenging the circumstances of the case. (Para 16) |
| 7. issues concerning dna evidence and its reliability. (Para 24 , 27 , 28 , 30) |
| 8. final judgment leading to acquittal. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Invoking criminal appellate jurisdiction of this Court, the present Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, 'CrPC') has been preferred by the appellants herein against the Judgment & Order dated 17.11.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sarangarh, District Raigarh in Sessions Case No.29/2015 whereby each of the appellants has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 /149, 201/149 & 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (in short, ‘IPC’) and sentenced in the following manner:-
| Conviction | Sentence |
| 1. u/S. 302/149 of IPC. | Imprisonment for Life and fine |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
