MANMOHAN SINGH
Manish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Hemlata – Respondent
Manmohan Singh, J.
1. By way of the present petition under Section 115 of CPC, the petitioner has assailed the eviction order dated 26th March, 2013 passed by the learned Addl. Rent Controller whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner was dismissed for the reason mainly that the same was not filed within the stipulated period prescribed under the Act.
2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petitions are that the respondent had filed an eviction petition bearing No.E-25/2010 against the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) in respect of an L- Shape shop No.3 situated in the property bearing No. 41, Subhash Park, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “tenanted premises”). However the petitioner did not file the leave to defend application within the prescribed period of 15 days.
3. The petitioner had filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in moving leave to defend application. It was stated in the application that the copy of the summons and annexure was not complete and page Nos. 19, 20, 32,
Rakesh Kumar vs. Gandharv Singh, 155 (2008) DLT 750
Ravi Dutt Sharma vs. Ratan Lal Bhargava
Prithipal Singh vs. Satpal Singh (D) through legal heirs, 2010 (2) SCC 15
Olive Marques vs. Union of India, 2013 (199) DLT 727
Keshavananda Bharati Vs. The State of Kerala (1973) Supp SCR 1.
Om Prakash vs. Ashwani Kumar Bassi
Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by LRs vs. Union of India (UOI) & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.