GITA MITTAL, J.

1. Vide this judgment, we propose to decide the challenge to the judgment dated 1st July, 2014 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of several applications and consequently the suit being CS(OS)No.2277/2010.

2. For the sake of convenience, we propose to refer to the appellant as 'SICPA' and the other parties by the same nomenclature as has been assigned to them by the learned Single Judge. Also to facilitate consideration, we may first and foremost note the parties to the litigation. SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. (SICPA for brevity hereafter) as plaintiff brought the suit against Shri Kapil Kumar (Defendant no.1); his wife Smt. Ritu Kumar (Defendant no.2); M/s Brushman (India) Ltd. (defendant no.3); ICICI Bank Ltd. (defendant no.4); DLF Ltd. (defendant no.5) and; M/s Genesis Finance Co. Ltd. (Defendant no.6).

It is noteworthy that while the opposite party nos.1 to 3 were arrayed as defendants, the defendant nos.4 to 6 were arrayed as proforma parties. They are also so described in the plaint.

3. Details of the applications decided by the impugned judgm