SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Renew Wind Energy (shivpur) Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 11011 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 33946 of 2021
Decided On : 29-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
Ajay Vohra, Advocate, Aditya Vohra, Advocate, Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate

Violation of principles of natural justice in the issuance of draft assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Draft Assessment Order - The court held that the principles of natural justice were violated as the petitioner was not given sufficient time to respond to the notice and the annexure to the notice was not supplied. The respondent was directed to provide a copy of the annexure and the petitioner was given liberty to respond within two weeks. The respondent was also directed to decide the notice by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the draft assessment order passed by the respondent under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19, citing violation of principles of natural justice.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the principles of natural justice were violated as the petitioner was not given sufficient time to respond to the notice and the annexure to the notice was not supplied. The court directed the respondent to provide a copy of the annexure and allowed the petitioner to respond within two weeks. The respondent was also directed to decide the notice by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks.

Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice in the issuance of the draft assessment order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the principles of natural justice were violated due to insufficient time given to the petitioner to respond to the notice and the failure to supply the annexure to the notice.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to provide a copy of the annexure and allowed the petitioner to respond within two weeks. The respondent was also directed to decide the notice by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - Today Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, learned counsel for the Revenue, once again requests for an opportunity to file a counter affidavit. On the last date of hearing i.e., 28th September, 2021, Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, learned counsel for the Revenue, had accepted notice on behalf of the respondent and had been directed to file a counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. However, no counter affidavit has been filed till date.

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is only praying for a remand.

3. Keeping in view the aforesaid limited prayer, further time to file a counter affidavit is declined and the matter is taken up for hearing.

2. It is pertinent to mention that present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned draft assessment order dated 02nd September, 2021 passed by the respondent under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B and Section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2018-19.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent issued notice on Friday, 27th August 2021 at 8:20 pm, requiring the petitioner to file information as per the attached annexure, within two days of receipt of the notice. He points out that the petitioner came to know about this notice on 30th August 2021. He emphasizes that no annexure referred to in the notice was uploaded on the income-tax portal or enclosed to the notice. He states that the petitioner, accordingly, filed e-response against the notice, requesting for copy of the annexure as well as time till 06th September 2021 to file response against the notice dated 27th August 2021.

4. He emphasises that ignoring the response and request for additional time, the respondent passed draft assessment order for the assessment year 2018-19, wherein income of the petitioner was assessed at Rs. 149.05 crores approx. as against NIL income returned by the petitioner.

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court is of the view that the principles of natural justice have been violated in the present case inasmuch as the petitioner was not given sufficient time to file its response to the notice dated 27th August, 2021 and the annexure to the notice was not supplied.

6. Consequently, the respondent is directed to supply a copy of the annexure to the notice dated 27th August, 2021 within a week and the petitioner is given liberty to respond to the said notice as well as the annexure within two weeks thereafter. The respondent shall decide the notice dated 27th August, 2021 by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within twelve weeks. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said decision, it shall be open to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition and the pending applications are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top