Back
VIBHU BAKHRU
Union Of India Through Pwd (gnctd) – Appellant
Versus
Continental Engineering Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. - The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter 'the a&C act') impugning an arbitral award dated 10.12.2019 (hereinafter 'the impugned award') delivered by the arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole arbitrator.
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 14.05.2013 (hereinafter 'the agreement'). The dispute before the arbitral Tribunal related to the respondent's claim for reimbursement of Service Tax and Environmental Compensation Cess (Claim no. 1 and Claim no. 2). The arbitral Tribunal partly accepted the claim for reimbursement of Service Tax in respect of certain services availed by the respondent (hereinafter 'CEC') and entered an award for a sum of Rs. 1,38,58,095/- in respect of Claim no. 1. The arbitral Tribunal also accepted CEC's claim for reimbursement of Environmental Compensation Cess (hereinafter 'ECC') and awarded a sum of Rs. 3,14,06,709/-, in its favour. In addition, the arbitral Tribunal awarded interest at the rate of 10% per annum on the aforesaid awarded amounts. Th
Reimbursement of Service Tax under construction contracts requires explicit entitlement in the contract; claims for taxes not directly related to services provided under the contract are not compensa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 to an international commercial arbitration, and the ....
The inapplicability of the ground of patent illegality to international commercial arbitration and the importance of interpreting specific contractual clauses in determining the validity of claims an....
The court confirmed that under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, an arbitral award can only be set aside on narrow grounds, emphasizing the interpretation of contract terms is primarily for the arbi....
The court emphasized that arbitrators must operate within the contractual provisions; awards can be overturned if arbitrators act beyond their jurisdiction, particularly regarding deductions not expl....
The learned Arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction in reviewing the Original Award under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Every error of law committed by an arbitral tribunal does not fall within the scope of the patent illegality. However, the Court had also clarified that illegality, which goes to the root of the matt....
Point of law: In terms of Section 21 of the A&C Act, the arbitral proceedings commence on the date of receipt of notice invoking the arbitration agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
