Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Continental Engineering Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging the arbitral award under a&c act (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of the contractual framework and timeline (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. claims for service tax and ecc reimbursement (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. arbitration initiation and process (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. submissions to the arbitral tribunal (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. arbitral tribunal's award analysis (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. petitioner's contest of award grounds (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. conditions for service tax reimbursement (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. court clarification on reimbursement criteria (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48) |
| 10. ecc reimbursement acceptance and interest award (Para 49 , 50) |
| 11. final order on petition (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter `the A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 10.12.2019 (hereinafter `the impugned award') delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator.
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that have arisen between the p
Reimbursement of Service Tax under construction contracts requires explicit entitlement in the contract; claims for taxes not directly related to services provided under the contract are not compensa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 to an international commercial arbitration, and the ....
The inapplicability of the ground of patent illegality to international commercial arbitration and the importance of interpreting specific contractual clauses in determining the validity of claims an....
The court confirmed that under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, an arbitral award can only be set aside on narrow grounds, emphasizing the interpretation of contract terms is primarily for the arbi....
The Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of reimbursement based on actual costs incurred due to statutory changes is valid, despite disputes over contract terms, reinforcing the principle of contractua....
The court emphasized that arbitrators must operate within the contractual provisions; awards can be overturned if arbitrators act beyond their jurisdiction, particularly regarding deductions not expl....
The learned Arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction in reviewing the Original Award under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Point of law: In terms of Section 21 of the A&C Act, the arbitral proceedings commence on the date of receipt of notice invoking the arbitration agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
