IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Laxmi Narayan Jilowa, Ex Sgt 673133-f - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 2048, 2052 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2022
Exemption - Pro Rata Pension - The court allowed exemption subject to verification and right of appeal, directing the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed to petitioners in previous cases and provided the requisite No Objection Certificates.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
Issues: Claim for pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, and communication of reasons if not entitled.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the similarity of the petitioners' cases to previous cases and directed the grant of pro rata pension if found similarly placed, with a provision for further remedies if not entitled.
Final Decision: The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
CM aPPL. 5893/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2048/2022 CM aPPL. 5898/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2052/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2048/2022 W.P.(C) 2052/2022
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th april, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.
4. accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents - Indian air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.
5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases and provision for further remedies if not entitled.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on being similarly placed to previous petitioners, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous petitions, NOCs, right to verification, and appeal.
The entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and the consequences of non-payment of arrears with interest.
The entitlement to pro rata pension for similarly placed petitioners as established in previous cases.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for eligible petitioners, ensuring compliance with equal treatment principles and due verification standards from prior judgments.
Entitlement to pro rata pension is affirmed based on established precedents, contingent upon verification, with specific provisions for interest on delays.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, with the right to verification and appeal, and specified consequences for non-entitlemen....
The court mandated verification of petitioners' entitlements to pro rata pension based on precedents, with interest on late payments.
The court mandates that if the petitioner is similarly placed as in prior judgements, pro-rata pension must be granted, reinforcing the obligation for verification and timely communication regarding ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.