IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Manish Kumar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 567 of 2021
Decided On : 15-01-2021
Pension - Pro Rata Pension - Court directs Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in previous cases and to pay arrears with interest if not paid within twelve weeks
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners claim to be similarly placed to petitioners in previous cases and seek the same relief of pro rata pension. The requisite No Objection Certificates have been filed along with the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court directs the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners similarly placed as in previous cases and to pay arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment. If arrears are not paid within twelve weeks, interest at 7% per annum will be incurred.
Issues: The main issue is the entitlement of the petitioners to pro rata pension and the court's direction to the Indian Air Force for the same.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision is based on the petitioners being similarly placed as in previous cases and the right to pro rata pension as established in those cases.
Final Decision: The court orders the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners similarly placed as in previous cases and to pay arrears of pro rata pension with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - Cm Appl. 1476/2021 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 567/2021
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that all the petitioners in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions,2020 SCCOnLineDel 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India,2019 SCCOnLineDel 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petition.
4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The entitlement to pro rata pension for similarly placed petitioners as established in previous cases.
The court upheld that petitioners similarly placed to prior judgments are entitled to pro rata pension benefits, mandating timely compliance by the respondents with specified conditions.
Entitlement to pro rata pension is affirmed based on established precedents, contingent upon verification, with specific provisions for interest on delays.
The court's decision was based on the entitlement of pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and payment of arrears with interest.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous petitions, NOCs, right to verification, and appeal.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, communication of reasons if not entitled, and the payment of arrears with interest if no....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to pro rata pension in line with previous judgments.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases and provision for further remedies if not entitled.
The court upheld the right to pro rata pension for similarly placed individuals and emphasized the requirement for communication of reasons if not entitled, allowing further remedies.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on being similarly placed to previous petitioners, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.