IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Minor A Through Her Legal Guardian – Appellant
Versus
Government Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 1103 of 2023 and CM APPL. 4351, 4352 of 2023
Decided on : 31-01-2023
Prtotection of children from sexual offences Act, 2012 – Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 – Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – Sexual Harassment – First Information Report against Sexual assault – Punishment for rape – Petition has been filed by Petitioner through her legal guardian mother who has joined Court proceedings today virtually seeking directions to Respondents to terminate pregnancy of Petitioner – Held, Petitioner shall get admitted into hospital tomorrow morning doctors in medical board have assured that they would give best possible care during process of termination of pregnancy – Petitioner is a victim of sexual assault cost of termination of pregnancy shall be borne by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India – Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner through her legal guardian i.e. her mother, who has joined the Court proceedings today virtually, seeking directions to the Respondents to terminate the pregnancy of the Petitioner.
3. The present is yet another unfortunate situation involving a minor who is 13 years of age. Her father is a man of limited economic means and runs a small momos shop and her mother works as a maid with a daily income. The family consists of the Petitioner’s parents as also her two siblings.
4. It is the case of the Petitioner that she was subjected to sexual assault and FIR being FIR No. 37/2023 dated 21st January, 2023 was registered in respect of the same under the POCSO Act, 2012.
5. A case is also registered under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 with the Child Welfare Committee (District South) as case no. 66 of 2023. The Child Welfare Committee directed on 23rd January, 2023 that the CMO, Safdarjung hospital ought to take a decision in respect of the further action under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. In terms of the same, a board consisting Dr. Anjali Dabral, Professor, HAG & HOD, Obst & Gynae, Dr. Yamini Sarwal, Dr. Anita Yadav and Dr. Shafali Gupta (hereinafter, “medical board”) examined the Petitioner and filed a report. As per the said report, the Medical Board has opined that the pregnancy cannot be terminated as the period of gestation is more than 24 weeks and there is no gross congenital anomaly.
6. The petition was listed yesterday, i.e. on 30th January, 2023 and the Medical Board was directed examine the Petitioner and appear before the Court today to appraise the court as to the risks involved in both the continuation as also the non-continuation of the pregnancy of the Petitioner.
7. The medical board consisting of Dr. Bindu Bajaj, Dr. Yamini, Dr. Shefali Gupta and Dr. Anita Yadav from the VMMC Safdarjung Hospital have joined the proceedings virtually today. They submit that the Dr. Anjali Dabral has been replaced by Dr. Bindu Bajaj as the HAG & HOD, Obst & Gynae.
8. The Court has interacted with them. From the interaction, it appears to the Court that there are risks involved for the Petitioner in the termination of pregnancy as also in continuing with the pregnancy.
9. The Petitioner is only 13 years of age who is stated to be a victim of sexual assault and a FIR has already been registered for the same. Further, the Petitioner does not wish to carry on with the pregnancy. This stand of the Petitioner has been confirmed by her mother, who is acting as her legal guardian. Under these circumstances, keeping in mind the interest of the life of the Petitioner, her tender age, her education and keeping in mind the social circumstances, even though the gestational period is more than 25 weeks, this Court is of the opinion that the pregnancy is terminated.
10. Accordingly, the medical board of Safdarjung Hospital is directed to proceed with termination of pregnancy tomorrow i.e. on 1st February, 2023. The Petitioner shall get admitted into the hospital tomorrow morning around 9 am. The doctors in the medical board have assured that they would give her the best possible care during the process of termination of pregnancy.
11. A sample of foetus shall also be preserved for the purpose of criminal case, which may be required in future.
12. Considering that the Petitioner is a victim of sexual assault, the cost of the termination of the pregnancy shall be borne by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
13. The DCPA shall, in terms of the order dated 25th January, 2023 of Child Welfare Committee (District South), shall release a sum of Rs.10,000/- for immediate nutrition and other medical needs of the Petitioner post the termination of pregnancy.
14. The writ petition along with all pending applications is disposed of in the aforementioned t
The court allowed the termination of a minor's pregnancy resulting from rape, prioritizing her mental health and well-being over the continuation of the pregnancy.
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
The court established that minors can terminate pregnancies resulting from sexual abuse with guardian consent, prioritizing mental health considerations.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the consideration of the physical and mental health risks to the pregnant....
The judgment establishes the principle that in cases of minors who are victims of sexual assault, the risks to their physical and mental health due to pregnancy should be considered, and medical term....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the mental and physical well-being of the victim in allowing the termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory limit.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking terminati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.