SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
SMS Limited - Appellant
Versus
Oil & Natural Gas Limited - Respondent
OMP (I) (COMM) 428 of 2020 & I.A. 12771 of 2020
Decided On : 12-01-2021

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Request for pre-arbitral injunction - Petitioner sought to restrain respondent from acting on a letter demanding payment of liquidated damages - The letter indicated a total amount of Rs. 14,27,60,084 comprising liquidated damages and GST to be recovered through bank guarantees if not paid - Petitioner argued that delays were due to respondent's inaction and that the requested bank guarantee amount exceeded the contract terms. (Paras 1-100)

(B) Contracts - Terms of bank guarantees - Distinction between conditional and unconditional guarantees - The court emphasized that bank guarantees must be honoured by the bank upon demand, and the invocation of guarantees cannot be interfered with unless fraud or irretrievable injustice is established - The bank's obligation was clear and independent of any disputes between parties. (Paras 56-90)

(C) Appeal dismissal - The court held that the invocation of bank guarantees was justified and the petitioner provided no substantial evidence of fraud or special equities meriting an injunction. (Paras 91-100)

Table of Content
1. petition under section 9 of arbitration act for pre-arbitral injunction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. overview of contract and its clauses. (Para 3 , 4)
3. chronology of events leading to delays and expansions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
4. discussions on project delays and extensions. (Para 9 , 12 , 14)
5. communications regarding bank guarantees and liquidated damages. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. sms's response to ongc's demands for additional bank guarantees. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 31)
7. discussions of legal positions and contentions. (Para 38 , 42 , 46)
8. court's conclusion on the unlikelihood of granting injunctions. (Para 55 , 76 , 93 , 96)
9. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 100)

JUDGMENT

(Video-Conferencing)

1. By this petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), the petitioner SMS Ltd. prays for pre-arbitral injunction, restraining the respondent ONGC Ltd. from acting in furtherance of a letter dated 15th December, 2020, issued by the latter to the former. The letter reads thus:

"OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED

Onshore Engineering Services

Materials Management Section

2nd Floor, Tower-B Deendayal Urja Bhavan, 5,

Nelson Mandela Road, Delhi-110070

Ref No. DLH/OES/MM/ETP-NADA & AF/X11PC11001/2011 Dated: 15.12.2020
From: Office of GGM (MM)-i/c MM, Onshore Engineering Services, DDU Bhawan, Delhi
TO:
M/s. SMS Limited (Formerly M/s. SMS Infrastructure Limited) (Consortium of M/s. SMS Limited, Nagpur, M/s. Zen Marketing & Technologies, Kolkata and M/s. Tolani Projects Pvt. Ltd., Ankleshwar)
IT PARK. 20 S.T.P.I GAYATRI NAGAR

PARSODI, NAGPUR-440022
Sub: Amendment No. 11 to the Contract No. DLH/OES/MM/ETP-NADA & AF/X11PC11001/2011 dtd. 27.06.2012 for the Project 'Construction of ETP at Nada, Additional Handling Facilities alongwith laying of associated Pipelines in Area-Nat Ankleshwar Asset (ETP-Nada & AF)'

    Dear Sir(s),

    Please refer the Contract No. DLH/OES/MM/ETP-NADA & AF/X11PC11001/2011 dated 27.06.2012 for the Project for "Construction of ETP at Nada, Additional Handling Facilities alongwith laying of associated Pipelines in Area-IV at Ankleshwar Asset (ETP-Nada & AF)". ONGC hereby extends the scheduled completion period of the LSTK contract (Refer clause 6.3 of General conditions of contract for LSTK portion, Annexure-A, Part-A of the contract) from 31.07.2014 to 31.07.2018 with levy of 10 % Liquidated Damages amounting to Rs.12,09,83,122.10 as per the clause no.6.3.2 of General conditions of contract for LSTK portion, Annexure-A Part-A of the contract, plus GST thereon of Rs.2,17, 76,961.97 (as per GST legislation effective from 01.07.2017) totalling to Rs.14,27,60,084.00 as detailed below:

Delay solely attributable to Consortium as on 18.07.2018a) 3 Years 5 Months and 12 days in completion of standalone facilities (at Padra, Dabka, Jambusar, North Gandhar, GGS-Nada and ETP-Nada)
b) 3 Years 11 Months and 18 days in completion of GRE Pipelines.
Liquidated Damages@ 0.5% per week & part thereof for the delay10% (maximum)
Liquidated Damages amountRs.12,09,83,122.10
GST on Liquidated Damages amount @ 18%Rs.2,17,76,961.97
Total Liquidated Damages + GSTRs.14,27,60,084.00

    Accordingly, ONGC hereby requests you to remit the amount of Rs.14,27,60,084.00 towards Liquidated damages and GST thereon to ONGC by 22.12.2020.

    In case the amount of Rs.14,27,60,084.00 is not remitted to ONGC by 22.12.2020, then LD and GST shall be recovered by invoking and encashing the Bank Guarantees submitted by you towards Liquidated damages and GST thereon as per provisions of the contract, as detailed below:

Bank Guarantee particulars(i) Bank Guarantee No. 0713614BG0000139 for Rs.12,09,90,000.00 issued by SBI, Industrial Finance Branch, Nagpur.
(ii) Bank Guarantee No. 3761ILG003620 for Rs.2,66,17,800.00 issued by Punjab National Bank, Dharmpeth, Nagpur.
Total amount of bank GuaranteesRs.14,76,07,800.00 (i.e. Rs.12,09,90,000.00 + Rs.2,66
GST@ 18% on the total amount of Bank GuaranteesRs.2,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top