IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Keshaw Sanyasi Gawo Shewasharam – Appellant
Versus
Government of Nct, New Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 1726 of 2023 & CM Appls. 6541-42 of 2023
Decided On : 10-02-2023
Eviction - Trust - S.23 (ROAD)/S.B.A. MANDAL M- 321/166 - DUSIB Policy - Right to Shelter
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a registered trust running a cow shelter, challenged an eviction notice issued by the Public Welfare Department to demolish their slum and relocate to a shelter home identified by the Delhi Urban Improvement Shelter Board (DUSIB). The petitioner claimed to care for old, ailing, and abandoned cows in a Gaushala situated on the land in question.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the impugned eviction notice was valid, but directed the authorities to provide an alternate shelter home for the cows within a week and ensure basic amenities at the relocated shelter home. The court also exempted the cows from the maximum three-month stay period applicable to humans.
Issues: Validity of eviction notice, right to shelter for slum dwellers, and relocation of cows
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the DUSIB Policy and previous judgments to establish the legal position that until jhuggi clusters are duly notified, stay on demolition would not be feasible. The court emphasized the right to shelter and directed the authorities to provide an alternate shelter home for the cows and ensure basic amenities.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the direction to provide an alternate shelter home for the cows and ensure basic amenities, exempting the cows from the maximum three-month stay period.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The case of the Petitioner- Keshaw Sanyasi Gawo Shewasharam is that it is a registered trust and is running a cow shelter and mandir at Bhairon Marg. The challenge of the Petitioner in the instant petition is to the impugned notice of eviction bearing no. S23 (ROAD)/S.B.A. MANDAL M- 321/166 dated 28th January, 2023 issued by the Public Welfare Department which reads as under:
"All you slum dwellers Bhairo Marg, Opposite Gate No.1, Pragati Maidan are informed to voluntarily demolish your slum within 15 days of information phase, otherwise, your slum will be removed with the help of police and Will be sent to the shelter home (Dwarka, Geeta Colony) identified by the Delhi Urban Improvement Shelter Board (DUSIB), in which the maximum period of stay will be 03 months."
3. It is the case of the Petitioner that it is involved in taking care and looking after old, ailing, and abandoned cows in a Gaushala. The Gaushala of the Petitioner is situated upon the land in respect of which the impugned notice dated 28th January, 2023 has been issued by Respondent No.2.
4. It is the case of the Petitioner that the said Gaushala has been existing on the said land for the past 15 years. The Petitioner has electricity connection installed, and the Aadhaar card of the Chairperson of the Petitioner has been issued in respect of the said premises only.
5. It is the submission of the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner that the impugned notice has been issued without any show cause notice or providing any hearing to the Petitioner.
6. Ld. counsel for the Respondents, including ld. Counsel for DUSIB, have entered appearance. Mr. Chauhan, ld. Counsel for the DUSIB, upon a specific query from the Court as to whether the JJ cluster at Bhairon Marg is a notified cluster under the Policy or not, states that the Petitioner's jhuggi cluster does not belong to notified clusters, which are 675 and 82 in number.
7. Mr. Chauhan, ld. Counsel, also relies upon the recent order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 1386/2023 titled Kash Ram v. Public Works Department, GNCTD where the Court had directed demolition of jhuggis in the Dhaula Kuan area, subject to certain conditions.
8. Heard. It is now the settled position in law that until and unless the jhuggi clusters are duly notified, stay on demolition would not be feasible.
9. This position of law has recently been reiterated by this Court in Shakarpur Slum Union v. DDA, [W.P.(C) 6779/2021, decision dated 2nd August, 2022,] wherein the Court held as under:
"37. This Court while dealing with Ajay Maken (supra) and Sudama Singh (supra) never gave any licence to any person to encroach upon Government property. However, this Court is dealing with a human problem and right to shelter has been described as right which has to be protected by Courts especially for those who will have no place to go with their family and belongings if they are faced with mid-night demolitions. In order to ameliorate the human problem, this Court in Sudama Singh (supra) had directed that the State Government must formulate a comprehensive protocol to ensure that persons who have encroached upon Government lands are not rendered shelter-less and, therefore, a rehabilitation policy has to be brought out to rehabilitate those persons. It was in pursuance of that judgment that DUSIB was made the nodal agency for rehabilitation of the persons living in JJ clusters. Parameters were laid down as to who would be entitled to the benefit of the DUSIB Policy. The judgment of this Court in Ajay Maken (supra) cannot be interpreted to mean clusters not identified by the DUSIB would be entitled to rehabilitation.
XXX
42. Resultantly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DDA to carry out further demolition only in consultation with the DUSIB. The DDA is further directed to give sufficient time to the dwellers to make alternate arrangements or
The right to shelter must be protected, and authorities must ensure basic amenities for relocated individuals and animals.
The right to shelter and the need for a comprehensive protocol to ensure rehabilitation of persons living in JJ clusters.
Eligibility for rehabilitation or relocation under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 is contingent upon the existence of jhuggi jhopri basti clusters before specific da....
The main legal point established is that unless a jhuggi is part of the recognized cluster of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, no rehabilitation can be directed.
The judgment established that for entitlement to protection/rehabilitation under the existing policy framework for rehabilitation of residents of Jhuggi-Jhopri in Delhi, the settlement must qualify a....
Failure to substantiate entitlement to rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 results in denial of the benefit. However, authorities must provide temporar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner and other residents of the jhuggis were not entitled to rehabilitation as per the DUSIB policy, 2015, and the DUSIB Act, 2010. ....
Concealment of material facts and failure to comply with court directions can lead to the dismissal of a petition seeking rehabilitation and stay on demolition. Only the notified clusters as per the ....
The judgment established that under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, residents must prove that their clusters were notified by DUSIB and that the jhuggis were constru....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.