SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2552

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Ms. Sonia Singhania, Advocates for DDA.
Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj & Mr. Rahul Bhardwaj, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate, Ms. Samapika Biswal, Advocates, and Mr. Aman Kumar Yadav, Advocates for Ld. Administrator.
Mr. Luv Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Ritank, Advocates for SDMC.
Mr. Satish Sahai, Preeti Chaudhary, Advocate, Mr. Akarshan Bhardwaj, Ms. Garima Anand & Mr. Nitin Panwar, Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocate, Mr. Ishkaran Singh, Advocates for 19 shopkeepers.
Mr. Paul Kumar Kalai and Mr. Kaoliangpov Kamei, Advs for Petitioner.
Mr. Puneet Jain & Mr. Yogit Kamat, Dr. Charu Wali Khanna and Mr. Dharmendra Baghel, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Advocates for R-58(iii).
Mr. Ankur Kashyap & Mr. Aditya Panda, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Mr. Harshvardhan Sharma and Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Advocates, for R-1a, b, c, d, 2, 3, 4 & 5.
Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra & Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocates, Mr. Goonmeet Singh, Architect, Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SHO.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

Redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir

3. On 9th September, 2022, the Court had viewed the presentations prepared in respect of the redevelopment plan of the Kalkaji Mandir by the Architect appointed by the Court- Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, as also by the Architect on behalf of Baridaars and Purjaris- Ms. Himanshi Kaushik. After perusing the plans presented by both the architects, the Court had passed the following order:

    15. This Court has viewed the presentations made by both the Architects and has perused the two development plans. Some of the suggestions made by the baridaars/pujaris can also be incorporated by the Court-appointed Architect. Accordingly, it is directed that the baridaars/pujaris and their Architect - Ms. Kaushik, may work together with Mr. Chauhan and prepare a joint redevelopment plan, after taking into account the suggestions of the baridaars/pujaris and integrating the same into the redevelopment plan which has been prepared by Mr. Chauhan. The joi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top