PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
Redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir
3. On 9th September, 2022, the Court had viewed the presentations prepared in respect of the redevelopment plan of the Kalkaji Mandir by the Architect appointed by the Court- Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, as also by the Architect on behalf of Baridaars and Purjaris- Ms. Himanshi Kaushik. After perusing the plans presented by both the architects, the Court had passed the following order:
15. This Court has viewed the presentations made by both the Architects and has perused the two development plans. Some of the suggestions made by the baridaars/pujaris can also be incorporated by the Court-appointed Architect. Accordingly, it is directed that the baridaars/pujaris and their Architect - Ms. Kaushik, may work together with Mr. Chauhan and prepare a joint redevelopment plan, after taking into account the suggestions of the baridaars/pujaris and integrating the same into the redevelopment plan which has been prepared by Mr. Chauhan. The joi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.