Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
FAO 36/2021 & CM APPLs. 2914/2021, 10442/2021, 10444/2021, 20904/2021, 23819/2021, 25868/2021, 25869/2021, 25870/2021, 25884/2021, 25885/2021, 26495/2021, 29121/2021, 38063/2021, 38289/2021, 39643/2021, 43944/2021, 43945/2021 & 43946/2021
CM (M) 323/2021 & CM APPLs. 14178/2021, 20945/2021, 20949/2021, 40269/2021
CM (M) 575/2021 & CM APPL. 43796/2021
CONT.CAS(C) 614/2021
3. In terms of order dated 21st December, 2021, the report of the Ld. Administrator has been received. The same is detailed in nature. By way of the said report, the ld. Administrator has submitted his recommendations, after discussions with the baridaars, the shopkeepers, as also the various governmental authorities. Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, the architect and his team have also been involved in the said deliberations. The broad recommendations of the ld. Administrator have been given in paragraph 65 of the report, which has been extracted below:
"65. The directions being sought from this Hon'
The court underscored the importance of cooperative redevelopment involving community contributions for timely management and safety of the temple premises.
The central legal point established is the court's authority to direct stakeholder contributions, fund management, and compliance with redevelopment directives.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
Court emphasizes proactive measures against encroachment on religious premises, directing authorities to erect a boundary wall and manage shopkeeper licenses to ensure compliance and community welfar....
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments and address concerns related to the redevelopment of the K....
Timely vacating of premises for re-development is crucial to facilitate the cleaning and re-development of the Mandir premises.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
The court affirms its jurisdiction in overseeing compliance with administrative directives regarding unauthorized occupation and emphasizes structured redevelopment for community benefit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
