Neeta Bhardwaj vs Kamlesh Sharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 1410

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
R.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, K.G. Chhokar, Advocate, Haider Ali, Advocate, Kawalpreet Kaur, Advocate, Harvinder Kumar, Advocate, Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate, Yogender Nath Bhardwaj, Advocate, Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate, Luv Bhardwaj, Advocate, Nakul Bhardwaj, Advocate, Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, Yoginder Singh, Advocate, Shailender Kumar Gautam, Advocate, Ravi Sharma, Advocate, Rohit Kishan Naagpal, Advocate, Dipanshu Gaba, Advocate, Anuroop P.S, Advocate, Gaurav Bidhuri, Advocate, Kamal Kant Bhardwaj, Advocate, Sarvesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate, Dinkar Bhardwaj, Advocate, D.K. Singhal, Advocate, Samapika Biswal, Advocate, Shambhavi Kala, Advocate, Kartikeya Sharma, Advocate, Arun Birbal, Advocate, Sanjay Singh, Advocate, Rameezuddin Raja, Advocate, Sangeeta Bharti, Advocate, Thakur Sumit, Advocate, Nitin Jain, Advocate, Vishal Chauhan, Advocate, Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, Harshil Gupta, Advocate, r. K.P. Singh, Advocate, Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate, Siddharth Panda, Advocate, Deepak Dewan, Advocate, Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate, Arun Panwar, Advocate, Mini Pushkarna, Advocate, Latika Malhotra, Advocate, Khushboo, Advocate, Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done by video conferencing.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

FaO 36/2021 & CM aPPLs. 2914/2021, 10442/2021, 10444/2021, 20904/2021, 23819/2021, 25868/2021, 25869/2021, 25870/2021, 25884/2021, 25885/2021, 26495/2021, 29121/2021, 38063/2021, 38289/2021, 39643/2021, 43944/2021, 43945/2021 & 43946/2021

CM (M) 323/2021 & CM aPPLs. 14178/2021, 20945/2021, 20949/2021, 40269/2021

CM (M) 575/2021 & CM aPPL. 43796/2021 CONT.CaS(C) 614/2021

3. In terms of order dated 21st December, 2021, the report of the Ld. administrator has been received. The same is detailed in nature. By way of the said report, the ld. administrator has submitted his recommendations, after discussions with the baridaars, the shopkeepers, as also the various governmental authorities. Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, the architect and his team have also been involved in the said deliberations. The broad recommendations of the ld. administrator have been given in paragraph 65 of the report, which has been extracted below:

'65. The directions being sought from this Hon'ble High Court ar